Rxvt X Terminal with Unicode Support
http://software.schmorp.de/#rxvt-unicode
rxvt-unicode is a clone of the well-known terminal emulator rxvt,
modified to store text in Unicode (either UCS-2 or UCS-4) and to use
locale-correct input and output. It also supports mixing multiple fonts
at the same time, including Xft fonts.
Authors:
--------
Marc Lehmann
- Devel package for openSUSE:Factory
-
6
derived packages
- Links to openSUSE:Factory / rxvt-unicode
- Has a link diff
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout X11:terminals/rxvt-unicode && cd $_ - Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
| Filename | Size | Changed |
|---|---|---|
| _link | 0000000124 124 Bytes | |
| rxvt-unicode-9.02-CVE-2008-1142-DISPLAY.patch | 0000001016 1016 Bytes | |
| rxvt-unicode-9.09.tar.bz2 | 0000883665 863 KB | |
| rxvt-unicode-rpmlintrc | 0000000048 48 Bytes | |
| rxvt-unicode.README.SuSE | 0000001001 1001 Bytes | |
| rxvt-unicode.changes | 0000033821 33 KB | |
| rxvt-unicode.spec | 0000004909 4.79 KB |
Revision 9 (latest revision is 67)
Marcus Rueckert (darix)
committed
(revision 9)
- reenable 256bit support:
the 256color support is a compile time option. so we provide 2
binaries now.
WARNING: you need a patched screen on < 11.4 to use the 256color
version.
- binaries come as <binname>-256color
- removed --with-term from the configure params.
each of the binaries will set correct TERM variable depending
on the compile time option
- added note to README.SuSE
- spec clean up
- added --enable-warnings to see the compiler warnings
Comments 4
With the recent update, the 256color version of the binaries are all missing in the generated RPM (urxvt-256color, urxvtc-256color, urxvtd-256color, ....)
This is because of install cleaning the buildroot, then building and installing 88 color version. Not sure though if this is related to a specific version of rpmbuild or spec file itself.
I have managed to tackle the problem mentioned by @bobbie424242 by adding:
%define __spec_install_pre %{___build_pre}\%{__mkdir_p} "%{dirname:%{buildroot}}"\%{__mkdir_p} "%{buildroot}"\%{nil}(sorry, formatting went wrong) at the top of the spec file. Works, but I'm not sure if this is a "kocher" way to handle. Looks like the problem is related to definition of this macro in/usr/lib/rpm/platform/x86_64-linux(rpm package).I would rather fix the build that it works without overriding the macro.
In doubt we can just use a _multibuild file to to build the 256color version