File libgcrypt-CVE-2017-7526-1.5.0-2.patch of Package compat-libgcrypt11

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File libgcrypt-CVE-2017-7526-1.5.0-2.patch of Package compat-libgcrypt11

From 8725c99ffa41778f382ca97233183bcd687bb0ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NIIBE Yutaka <gniibe@fsij.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:11:37 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] rsa: Add exponent blinding.

* cipher/rsa.c (secret_core_crt): Blind secret D with randomized
nonce R for mpi_powm computation.

Co-authored-by: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Signed-off-by: NIIBE Yutaka <gniibe@fsij.org>

The paper describing attack: https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/627

Sliding right into disaster: Left-to-right sliding windows leak
by Daniel J. Bernstein and Joachim Breitner and Daniel Genkin and
Leon Groot Bruinderink and Nadia Heninger and Tanja Lange and
Christine van Vredendaal and Yuval Yarom

It is well known that constant-time implementations of modular
  exponentiation cannot use sliding windows. However, software
  libraries such as Libgcrypt, used by GnuPG, continue to use sliding
  windows. It is widely believed that, even if the complete pattern of
  squarings and multiplications is observed through a side-channel
  attack, the number of exponent bits leaked is not sufficient to
  carry out a full key-recovery attack against RSA. Specifically,
  4-bit sliding windows leak only 40% of the bits, and 5-bit sliding
  windows leak only 33% of the bits.

In this paper we demonstrate a complete break of RSA-1024 as
  implemented in Libgcrypt. Our attack makes essential use of the fact
  that Libgcrypt uses the left-to-right method for computing the
  sliding-window expansion. We show for the first time that the
  direction of the encoding matters: the pattern of squarings and
  multiplications in left-to-right sliding windows leaks significantly
  more information about exponent bits than for right-to-left. We show
  how to incorporate this additional information into the
  Heninger-Shacham algorithm for partial key reconstruction, and use
  it to obtain very efficient full key recovery for RSA-1024. We also
  provide strong evidence that the same attack works for RSA-2048 with
  only moderately more computation.

Exponent blinding is a kind of workaround to add noise.  Signal (leak)
is still there for non-constant-time implementation.
---
 cipher/rsa.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cipher/rsa.c b/cipher/rsa.c
index 9f83e8f..ce73f10 100644
--- a/cipher/rsa.c
+++ b/cipher/rsa.c
@@ -1019,16 +1019,37 @@ secret_core_crt (gcry_mpi_t M, gcry_mpi_t C,
   gcry_mpi_t m1 = mpi_alloc_secure ( Nlimbs + 1 );
   gcry_mpi_t m2 = mpi_alloc_secure ( Nlimbs + 1 );
   gcry_mpi_t h  = mpi_alloc_secure ( Nlimbs + 1 );
-
-  /* m1 = c ^ (d mod (p-1)) mod p */
+  gcry_mpi_t D_blind = mpi_alloc_secure ( Nlimbs + 1 );
+  gcry_mpi_t r;
+  unsigned int r_nbits;
+
+  r_nbits = mpi_get_nbits (P) / 4;
+  if (r_nbits < 96)
+    r_nbits = 96;
+  r = mpi_alloc_secure ( (r_nbits + BITS_PER_MPI_LIMB-1)/BITS_PER_MPI_LIMB );
+
+  /* d_blind = (d mod (p-1)) + (p-1) * r            */
+  /* m1 = c ^ d_blind mod p */
+  _gcry_mpi_randomize (r, r_nbits, GCRY_WEAK_RANDOM);
+  mpi_set_highbit (r, r_nbits - 1);
   mpi_sub_ui ( h, P, 1 );
+  mpi_mul ( D_blind, h, r );
   mpi_fdiv_r ( h, D, h );
-  mpi_powm ( m1, C, h, P );
+  mpi_add ( D_blind, D_blind, h );
+  mpi_powm ( m1, C, D_blind, P );
 
-  /* m2 = c ^ (d mod (q-1)) mod q */
+  /* d_blind = (d mod (q-1)) + (q-1) * r            */
+  /* m2 = c ^ d_blind mod q */
+  _gcry_mpi_randomize (r, r_nbits, GCRY_WEAK_RANDOM);
+  mpi_set_highbit (r, r_nbits - 1);
   mpi_sub_ui ( h, Q, 1  );
+  mpi_mul ( D_blind, h, r );
   mpi_fdiv_r ( h, D, h );
-  mpi_powm ( m2, C, h, Q );
+  mpi_add ( D_blind, D_blind, h );
+  mpi_powm ( m2, C, D_blind, Q );
+
+  mpi_free ( r );
+  mpi_free ( D_blind );
 
   /* h = u * ( m2 - m1 ) mod q */
   mpi_sub ( h, m2, m1 );
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

Places

File libgcrypt-CVE-2017-7526-1.5.0-2.patch of Package compat-libgcrypt11

Places