Overview
Request 767672 superseded
- Update to version 20200127:
* fix paths of ksysguard whitelisting
* fix zero-termination of error message for overly long paths
- Created by mkraus
- In state superseded
- Superseded by 769971
- Open review for factory-staging
Request History
mkraus created request
- Update to version 20200127:
* fix paths of ksysguard whitelisting
* fix zero-termination of error message for overly long paths
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
dimstar accepted review
licensedigger accepted review
ok
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:N as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:N"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:N"
dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer
Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:N"
dimstar declined review
/usr/lib/libexec? Does not exist in any current or planned version of openSUSE (to my knowledge... There are plans to move stuff from /usr/lib to /usr/libexec, but libexec is not planned to be bi arch
dimstar declined request
/usr/lib/libexec? Does not exist in any current or planned version of openSUSE (to my knowledge... There are plans to move stuff from /usr/lib to /usr/libexec, but libexec is not planned to be bi arch
superseded by 769971
That breaks Build on i586 ok ksysguard
Btw: who invented /usr/lib/libexec? That is just wrong by all means of what we have configured or plan to configure
Seems a fix in ksysguard to match this change is also on the way - please reopen this request and let's try (but the path is still a weird invention - and should be cleaned up for CODE16 latest)