The Mono DOT.net runtime for the Windows Emulator Wine.
This is the Win32 Mono runtime for Wine.
It provides .NET capabilities, runtime and development tools.
- Devel package for openSUSE:Factory:NonFree
-
5
derived packages
- Links to openSUSE:Factory:NonFree / wine-mono
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout Emulators/wine-mono && cd $_ - Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
| Filename | Size | Changed |
|---|---|---|
| _link | 0000000132 132 Bytes | |
| fix.patch | 0000003698 3.61 KB | |
| wine-mono-4.9.2.msi | 0094981632 90.6 MB | |
| wine-mono.changes | 0000003440 3.36 KB | |
| wine-mono.spec | 0000002489 2.43 KB |
Revision 11 (latest revision is 50)
Marcus Meissner (msmeissn)
committed
(revision 11)
- updated to 4.9.2 - Added a work-around for a mingw compiler bug causing crashes in SDL. - Added mscorwks.dll to the Microsoft.NET directory. - Fixed a bug where Wine fakedlls wouldn't install into Framework64 if msiexec is 32-bit. - Fixed https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47561 which caused winforms applications to fail in Imagelist_Read. - updated to 4.9.1 - Bug fixes from upstream Mono and FNA.
Comments 6
wine-mono-5.0.1released: https://github.com/madewokherd/wine-mono/releases
Are there any plans to provide a shared install of mono instead of the msi package? For reference: https://wiki.winehq.org/Mono#Shared_Install
Wow, that was quick. Thank you. The same is possible for wine-gecko: https://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko Could a shared installation be provided for gecko as well?
i am also adjusting wine-gecko.
I will see if we still need to ship the MSI then? Its not clear.
Thanks again. I don't think the msi is needed, if a shared install is available. At least that's the way I interpret "Wine tries to find Gecko installation in following order".
I tested with existing and new wine prefixes. For me everything works without the msi packages.