virtualbox
No description set
- Devel package for openSUSE:Factory
-
11
derived packages
- Developed at SCM
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout Virtualization/virtualbox && cd $_
- Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
Revision 303 (latest revision is 755)
Larry Finger (lwfinger)
committed
(revision 303)
- The printing of the warning about the insecurity in USB passthru had been lost. As most people are likely to want that feature, the logic has been inverted. Now, the required udev commands to allow passthru are included. The first time that VB is started, the user will get a screen that points to the bug entry discussing the problem and states what they should do to block the insecure usage. In any case, that screen will only be printed once. File "virtualbox-60-vboxdrv.rules" has been added These changes address the issues in bnc #1018340.
Comments 5
Virtualbox 7.1.0 Cannot install extension pack.
VBoxManage: error: Failed to install "/home/username/Downloads/virtualbox/Oracle_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-7.1.0.vbox-extpack" VBoxManage: error: Failed to load the main module ('/usr/lib/virtualbox/ExtensionPacks/Oracle_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack/linux.amd64/VBoxPuelMain.so'): VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND - /usr/lib/virtualbox/ExtensionPacks/Oracle_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack/linux.amd64/VBoxPuelMain.so: undefined symbol: _ZN21RTCRestBinaryResponse19setConsumerCallbackEPFiPS_PKvmjmmEPv VBoxManage: error: Details: code NS_ERROR_FAILURE (0x80004005), component ExtPackManagerWrap, interface IExtPackManager VBoxManage: error: Context: "RTEXITCODE handleExtPack(HandlerArg*)" at line 2099 of file VBoxManageMisc.cpp
The problem here is that the extension pack was built with -std=c++14 (or earlier), but virtualbox was built with -std=c++17 (or something later), which is a requirement because of the use of the
<filesystem>
header. As per https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/noexcept_spec , "noexcept" is part of the function signature in C++17, and so that's why virtualbox has—wait for it—..CallbackEPDoFiPS..
instead ofCallbackEPFiPS
(theDo
part is that noexcept specifier). Well, in short, that's the bad part of the ext pack being closed-source.Also how can I submit issues?
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/ , "File a bug" icon.
Just filed a bug there: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1231225