File 0002-rsa-rsa_eay.c-implement-variant-of-Smooth-... of Package compat-openssl098.11471

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File 0002-rsa-rsa_eay.c-implement-variant-of-Smooth-CRT-RSA.patch of Package compat-openssl098.11471

From f9381fd323303316282331a8cced6e030e809794 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 20:20:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] rsa/rsa_eay.c: implement variant of "Smooth CRT-RSA."

In [most common] case of p and q being of same width, it's possible to
replace CRT modulo operations with Montgomery reductions. And those are
even fixed-length Montgomery reductions...

(cherry picked from commit 41bfd5e7c8ac3a0874a94e4d15c006ad5eb48e59)

Resolved conflicts:
	crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6942)
---
 crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: openssl-1.0.1i/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c
===================================================================
--- openssl-1.0.1i.orig/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c
+++ openssl-1.0.1i/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ static int RSA_eay_mod_exp(BIGNUM *r0, c
 	BIGNUM *r1,*m1,*vrfy;
 	BIGNUM local_dmp1,local_dmq1,local_c,local_r1;
 	BIGNUM *dmp1,*dmq1,*c,*pr1;
-	int ret=0;
+        int ret = 0, smooth = 0;
 
 	BN_CTX_start(ctx);
 	r1 = BN_CTX_get(ctx);
@@ -841,6 +841,9 @@ static int RSA_eay_mod_exp(BIGNUM *r0, c
 				goto err;
 			if (!BN_MONT_CTX_set_locked(&rsa->_method_mod_q, CRYPTO_LOCK_RSA, q, ctx))
 				goto err;
+
+			smooth = (rsa->meth->bn_mod_exp == BN_mod_exp_mont)
+				&& (BN_num_bits(q) == BN_num_bits(p));
 			}
 	}
 
@@ -848,6 +851,46 @@ static int RSA_eay_mod_exp(BIGNUM *r0, c
 		if (!BN_MONT_CTX_set_locked(&rsa->_method_mod_n, CRYPTO_LOCK_RSA, rsa->n, ctx))
 			goto err;
 
+	if (smooth) {
+		/*
+		 * Conversion from Montgomery domain, a.k.a. Montgomery reduction,
+		 * accepts values in [0-m*2^w) range. w is m's bit width rounded up
+		 * to limb width. So that at the very least if |I| is fully reduced,
+		 * i.e. less than p*q, we can count on from-to round to perform
+		 * below modulo operations on |I|. Unlike BN_mod it's constant time.
+		 */
+		if (/* m1 = I moq q */
+		    !bn_from_mont_fixed_top(m1, I, rsa->_method_mod_q, ctx)
+		    || !bn_to_mont_fixed_top(m1, m1, rsa->_method_mod_q, ctx)
+		    /* m1 = m1^dmq1 mod q */
+		    || !BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime(m1, m1, rsa->dmq1, rsa->q, ctx,
+						  rsa->_method_mod_q)
+		    /* r1 = I mod p */
+		    || !bn_from_mont_fixed_top(r1, I, rsa->_method_mod_p, ctx)
+		    || !bn_to_mont_fixed_top(r1, r1, rsa->_method_mod_p, ctx)
+		    /* r1 = r1^dmp1 mod p */
+		    || !BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime(r1, r1, rsa->dmp1, rsa->p, ctx,
+						  rsa->_method_mod_p)
+		    /* r1 = (r1 - m1) mod p */
+		    /*
+		     * bn_mod_sub_fixed_top is not regular modular subtraction,
+		     * it can tolerate subtrahend to be larger than modulus, but
+		     * not bit-wise wider. This makes up for uncommon q>p case,
+		     * when |m1| can be larger than |rsa->p|.
+		     */
+		    || !bn_mod_sub_fixed_top(r1, r1, m1, rsa->p)
+
+		    /* r0 = r0 * iqmp mod p */
+		    || !bn_to_mont_fixed_top(r1, r1, rsa->_method_mod_p, ctx)
+		    || !bn_mul_mont_fixed_top(r1, r1, rsa->iqmp, rsa->_method_mod_p,
+					      ctx)
+		    || !bn_mul_fixed_top(r0, r1, rsa->q, ctx)
+		    || !bn_mod_add_fixed_top(r0, r0, m1, rsa->n))
+			goto err;
+
+		goto tail;
+	}
+
 	/* compute I mod q */
 	if (!(rsa->flags & RSA_FLAG_NO_CONSTTIME))
 		{
@@ -924,14 +967,29 @@ static int RSA_eay_mod_exp(BIGNUM *r0, c
 	if (!BN_mul(r1,r0,rsa->q,ctx)) goto err;
 	if (!BN_add(r0,r1,m1)) goto err;
 
-	if (rsa->e && rsa->n)
-		{
-		if (!rsa->meth->bn_mod_exp(vrfy,r0,rsa->e,rsa->n,ctx,rsa->_method_mod_n)) goto err;
+
+tail:
+	if (rsa->e && rsa->n) {
+		if (rsa->meth->bn_mod_exp == BN_mod_exp_mont) {
+			if (!BN_mod_exp_mont(vrfy, r0, rsa->e, rsa->n, ctx,
+					     rsa->_method_mod_n))
+				goto err;
+		} else {
+			bn_correct_top(r0);
+			if (!rsa->meth->bn_mod_exp(vrfy, r0, rsa->e, rsa->n, ctx,
+						   rsa->_method_mod_n))
+				goto err;
+		}
 		/* If 'I' was greater than (or equal to) rsa->n, the operation
 		 * will be equivalent to using 'I mod n'. However, the result of
 		 * the verify will *always* be less than 'n' so we don't check
 		 * for absolute equality, just congruency. */
 		if (!BN_sub(vrfy, vrfy, I)) goto err;
+		if (BN_is_zero(vrfy)) {
+			bn_correct_top(r0);
+			ret = 1;
+			goto err;   /* not actually error */
+		}
 		if (!BN_mod(vrfy, vrfy, rsa->n, ctx)) goto err;
 		if (BN_is_negative(vrfy))
 			if (!BN_add(vrfy, vrfy, rsa->n)) goto err;
@@ -955,6 +1013,15 @@ static int RSA_eay_mod_exp(BIGNUM *r0, c
 						   rsa->_method_mod_n)) goto err;
 			}
 		}
+	/*
+	 * It's unfortunate that we have to bn_correct_top(r0). What hopefully
+	 * saves the day is that correction is highly unlike, and private key
+	 * operations are customarily performed on blinded message. Which means
+	 * that attacker won't observe correlation with chosen plaintext.
+	 * Secondly, remaining code would still handle it in same computational
+	 * time and even conceal memory access pattern around corrected top.
+	 */
+	bn_correct_top(r0);
 	ret=1;
 err:
 	BN_CTX_end(ctx);

Places

File 0002-rsa-rsa_eay.c-implement-variant-of-Smooth-CRT-RSA.patch of Package compat-openssl098.11471

Places