File 0143-sd-sdhci-check-data-length-during-d.patch of Package qemu-testsuite.6044

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File 0143-sd-sdhci-check-data-length-during-d.patch of Package qemu-testsuite.6044

From bf8897465acc450403cd632f91008e36f806f428 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:39:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] sd: sdhci: check data length during dma_memory_read

While doing multi block SDMA transfer in routine
'sdhci_sdma_transfer_multi_blocks', the 's->fifo_buffer' starting
index 'begin' and data length 's->data_count' could end up to be same.
This could lead to an OOB access issue. Correct transfer data length
to avoid it.

Reported-by: Jiang Xin <jiangxin1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
[BR: CVE-2017-5667 BSC#1022541]
Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers <brogers@suse.com>
---
 hw/sd/sdhci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/sd/sdhci.c b/hw/sd/sdhci.c
index d28b5871fc..f4cf5c7c50 100644
--- a/hw/sd/sdhci.c
+++ b/hw/sd/sdhci.c
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static void sdhci_sdma_transfer_multi_blocks(SDHCIState *s)
                 boundary_count -= block_size - begin;
             }
             dma_memory_read(&address_space_memory, s->sdmasysad,
-                            &s->fifo_buffer[begin], s->data_count);
+                            &s->fifo_buffer[begin], s->data_count - begin);
             s->sdmasysad += s->data_count - begin;
             if (s->data_count == block_size) {
                 for (n = 0; n < block_size; n++) {

Places

File 0143-sd-sdhci-check-data-length-during-d.patch of Package qemu-testsuite.6044

Places