Sign Up
Log In
Log In
or
Sign Up
Places
All Projects
Status Monitor
Collapse sidebar
SUSE:SLE-12:Update
cross-armv6hl-gcc48-icecream-backend.8471
gcc48-aarch64-hack-reload-alt.diff
Overview
Repositories
Revisions
Requests
Users
Attributes
Meta
File gcc48-aarch64-hack-reload-alt.diff of Package cross-armv6hl-gcc48-icecream-backend.8471
This is for bsc#1093797 A miscompile in kernels btrfs module in reada.c. Preprocessed testcase and receipt for reproduction in bug report. In short, we're starting with an asm with a =Q constraint: (insn 186 185 188 18 (parallel [ (set (mem/j:HI (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 162 [ fs_info ]) (const_int 4416 [0x1140])) [0 MEM[(struct arch_spinlock_t *)_222].owner+0 S2 A32]) (asm_operands/v:HI (".if 1 == 1 ....") ("=Q") ...)))) pseudo 162 (fs_info) didn't get a hardreg, constraint "Q" requires a memory address in a single register. The constant 4416 will turn out to be invalid for an operand in any add instruction. reload will register these reloads: Reload 0: reload_in (DI) = (reg/v/f:DI 162 [ fs_info ]) GENERAL_REGS, RELOAD_FOR_INPUT_ADDRESS (opnum = 0) reload_in_reg: (reg/v/f:DI 162 [ fs_info ]) Reload 1: reload_in (DI) = (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 162 [ fs_info ]) (const_int 4416 [0x1140])) GENERAL_REGS, RELOAD_FOR_INPUT (opnum = 0), inc by 2 reload_in_reg: (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 162 [ fs_info ]) (const_int 4416 [0x1140])) Without changes these two reloads don't conflict (one is RELOAD_FOR_INPUT the other RELOAD_FOR_INPUT_ADDRESS), and hence are getting allocated the same reload reg (x4 in this case). The first reload generates this insn: (insn 836 185 838 18 (set (reg:DI 4 x4) (mem/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 29 x29) (const_int 128 [0x80])) [0 %sfp+32 S8 A64])) spinlock.h:158 33 {*movdi_aarch64} (nil)) The second reload wants to generate this insn (in gen_reload): (insn 839 838 186 18 (set (reg:DI 4 x4) (plus:DI (reg:DI 4 x4) (const_int 4416 [0x1140])))) which would be fine but emit_insn_if_valid_for_reload() finds out correctly that this insn is invalid (because constant doesn't match aarch64_plus_operand). The code in gen_reload handles this situation (see comments therein) by moving one operand into the reload register (here it chooses the constant, if it chose the other operand (the register) nothing would be solved, the constant would still be too large). _BUT_ the reload register is x4, which already contains an input to this insn. So what is generated is: (insn 838 836 839 18 (set (reg:DI 4 x4) (const_int 4416 [0x1140])) {*movdi_aarch64} (nil)) (insn 839 838 186 18 (set (reg:DI 4 x4) (plus:DI (reg:DI 4 x4) (reg:DI 4 x4))) {*adddi3_aarch64} (expr_list:REG_EQUIV (plus:DI (reg:DI 4 x4) (const_int 4416 [0x1140])) (nil))) hence x4 overwritten. There's commentary about this specific situation, and how to avoid it. The situation is: two reloads, one feeding the other and the other not being able to be generated as one instruction. The function gen_reload_chain_without_interm_reg_p specifically detects this situation (and in this case indeed says that an interim register is needed, i.e. that the reload_reg can't be the same for these two reloads). But that function is only used in a very specific case, namely when looking for conflicts between two RELOAD_FOR_OPERAND_ADDRESS reloads. In particular it's claimed (in reloads_conflict, reload_reg_free_p and reload_reg_free_for_value_p) that a RELOAD_FOR_INPUT and a RELOAD_FOR_INPUT_ADDRESS for the same operand never conflict. Obviously that's not true in this case on aarch64. In fact I don't see how this situation is avoided generally on other architectures. Possibly address forms with out-of-range offsets must be rejected such that the invalid offset itself generates a reload (rejecting just the whole address is equivalent to the above). The patch below does something like this: it detects the situation in the backends hinter for reloading addresses. When it sees an address consisting of a sum of a pseudo that didn't get a hardreg and a constant (or generally an operand) that's invalid for a single instruction then it reloads both operands of the PLUS (the whole plus is reloaded by the caller). This should be relatively safe, but it's unclear if it deals with all situation where this can occur as it doesn't touch reload itself. We do add a safety assert in gen_reload, though. That always trigger when we're about to miscompile for the above reasons. This assert doesn't trigger in the GCC testsuite even without patch. Index: gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c =================================================================== --- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c (revision 238821) +++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c (working copy) @@ -3747,6 +3758,22 @@ aarch64_legitimize_reload_address (rtx * BASE_REG_CLASS, GET_MODE (x), VOIDmode, 0, 0, opnum, (enum reload_type) type); return x; + } + + if (GET_CODE (x) == PLUS + && 1 + && REG_P (XEXP (x, 0)) + && !HARD_REGISTER_P (XEXP (x, 0)) + && reg_renumber[REGNO (XEXP (x, 0))] < 0 + && !aarch64_plus_operand (XEXP (x, 1), DImode)) + { + push_reload (XEXP (x, 0), NULL_RTX, &XEXP (x, 0), NULL, + BASE_REG_CLASS, GET_MODE (x), VOIDmode, 0, 0, + opnum, (enum reload_type) type); + push_reload (XEXP (x, 1), NULL_RTX, &XEXP (x, 1), NULL, + BASE_REG_CLASS, GET_MODE (x), VOIDmode, 0, 0, + opnum, (enum reload_type) type); + return x; } /* We wish to handle large displacements off a base register by splitting Index: gcc/reload1.c =================================================================== --- gcc/reload1.c (revision 238821) +++ gcc/reload1.c (working copy) @@ -8613,6 +8613,9 @@ gen_reload (rtx out, rtx in, int opnum, && !insn_operand_matches (code, 2, op1))) tem = op0, op0 = op1, op1 = tem; + /* We must not clobber op1! */ + gcc_assert (!reg_overlap_mentioned_p (out, op1)); + gen_reload (out, op0, opnum, type); /* If OP0 and OP1 are the same, we can use OUT for OP1.
Locations
Projects
Search
Status Monitor
Help
OpenBuildService.org
Documentation
API Documentation
Code of Conduct
Contact
Support
@OBShq
Terms
openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by
The Open Build Service is an
openSUSE project
.
Sign Up
Log In
Places
Places
All Projects
Status Monitor