Sign Up
Log In
Log In
or
Sign Up
Places
All Projects
Status Monitor
Collapse sidebar
No build reason found for SLE-Manager-Tools:aarch64
SUSE:SLE-15-SP4:Update
dbus-1-x11.29498
fix-CVE-2019-12749.patch
Overview
Repositories
Revisions
Requests
Users
Attributes
Meta
File fix-CVE-2019-12749.patch of Package dbus-1-x11.29498
From 47b1a4c41004bf494b87370987b222c934b19016 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com> Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 12:53:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] auth: Reject DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 for users other than the server owner The DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 authentication mechanism aims to prove ownership of a shared home directory by having the server write a secret "cookie" into a .dbus-keyrings subdirectory of the desired identity's home directory with 0700 permissions, and having the client prove that it can read the cookie. This never actually worked for non-malicious clients in the case where server uid != client uid (unless the server and client both have privileges, such as Linux CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE or traditional Unix uid 0) because an unprivileged server would fail to write out the cookie, and an unprivileged client would be unable to read the resulting file owned by the server. Additionally, since dbus 1.7.10 we have checked that ~/.dbus-keyrings is owned by the uid of the server (a side-effect of a check added to harden our use of XDG_RUNTIME_DIR), further ruling out successful use by a non-malicious client with a uid differing from the server's. Joe Vennix of Apple Information Security discovered that the implementation of DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 was susceptible to a symbolic link attack: a malicious client with write access to its own home directory could manipulate a ~/.dbus-keyrings symlink to cause the DBusServer to read and write in unintended locations. In the worst case this could result in the DBusServer reusing a cookie that is known to the malicious client, and treating that cookie as evidence that a subsequent client connection came from an attacker-chosen uid, allowing authentication bypass. This is mitigated by the fact that by default, the well-known system dbus-daemon (since 2003) and the well-known session dbus-daemon (in stable releases since dbus 1.10.0 in 2015) only accept the EXTERNAL authentication mechanism, and as a result will reject DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 at an early stage, before manipulating cookies. As a result, this vulnerability only applies to: * system or session dbus-daemons with non-standard configuration * third-party dbus-daemon invocations such as at-spi2-core (although in practice at-spi2-core also only accepts EXTERNAL by default) * third-party uses of DBusServer such as the one in Upstart Avoiding symlink attacks in a portable way is difficult, because APIs like openat() and Linux /proc/self/fd are not universally available. However, because DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 already doesn't work in practice for a non-matching uid, we can solve this vulnerability in an easier way without regressions, by rejecting it early (before looking at ~/.dbus-keyrings) whenever the requested identity doesn't match the identity of the process hosting the DBusServer. Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus/issues/269 Closes: CVE-2019-12749 --- dbus/dbus-auth.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) Index: dbus-1.12.2/dbus/dbus-auth.c =================================================================== --- dbus-1.12.2.orig/dbus/dbus-auth.c +++ dbus-1.12.2/dbus/dbus-auth.c @@ -529,6 +529,7 @@ sha1_handle_first_client_response (DBusA DBusString tmp2; dbus_bool_t retval = FALSE; DBusError error = DBUS_ERROR_INIT; + DBusCredentials *myself = NULL; _dbus_string_set_length (&auth->challenge, 0); @@ -565,6 +566,34 @@ sha1_handle_first_client_response (DBusA return FALSE; } + myself = _dbus_credentials_new_from_current_process (); + + if (myself == NULL) + goto out; + + if (!_dbus_credentials_same_user (myself, auth->desired_identity)) + { + /* + * DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 is not suitable for authenticating that the + * client is anyone other than the user owning the process + * containing the DBusServer: we probably aren't allowed to write + * to other users' home directories. Even if we can (for example + * uid 0 on traditional Unix or CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE on Linux), we + * must not, because the other user controls their home directory, + * and could carry out symlink attacks to make us read from or + * write to unintended locations. It's difficult to avoid symlink + * attacks in a portable way, so we just don't try. This isn't a + * regression, because DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 never worked for other + * users anyway. + */ + _dbus_verbose ("%s: client tried to authenticate as \"%s\", " + "but that doesn't match this process", + DBUS_AUTH_NAME (auth), + _dbus_string_get_const_data (data)); + retval = send_rejected (auth); + goto out; + } + /* we cache the keyring for speed, so here we drop it if it's the * wrong one. FIXME caching the keyring here is useless since we use * a different DBusAuth for every connection. @@ -679,6 +708,9 @@ sha1_handle_first_client_response (DBusA _dbus_string_zero (&tmp2); _dbus_string_free (&tmp2); + if (myself != NULL) + _dbus_credentials_unref (myself); + return retval; }
Locations
Projects
Search
Status Monitor
Help
OpenBuildService.org
Documentation
API Documentation
Code of Conduct
Contact
Support
@OBShq
Terms
openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by
The Open Build Service is an
openSUSE project
.
Sign Up
Log In
Places
Places
All Projects
Status Monitor