File gdb-symtab-fix-line-number-of-static-const-clas... of Package gdb

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File gdb-symtab-fix-line-number-of-static-const-class-mem.patch of Package gdb (Revision f858c161cc424e8b285237d19fbccb81)

Currently displaying revision f858c161cc424e8b285237d19fbccb81 , Show latest

From e5972def532f3ed248dfbd2f220f28dc367f4ca1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 15:45:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] [gdb/symtab] Fix line number of static const class
 member

Since commit 6d263fe46e0 ("Avoid bad breakpoints with --gc-sections"), there
was a silent regression on openSUSE Leap 15.4 for test-case
gdb.cp/m-static.exp, from:
...
(gdb) info variable everywhere^M
All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":^M
^M
File /home/vries/tmp.local-remote-host-native/m-static.h:^M
8:      const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M
(gdb)
...
to:
...
(gdb) info variable everywhere^M
All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":^M
^M
File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:^M
8:      const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M
^M
File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static1.cc:^M
8:      const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M
(gdb)
...

Another regression was found due to that commit, and it was fixed in commit
99d679e7b30 ("[gdb/symtab] Fix "file index out of range" complaint") by
limiting the scope of the fix in the original commit.

Fix this regression by yet further limiting the scope of that fix, making sure
that this bit in dwarf_decode_lines is executed again for m-static1.cc:
...
  /* Make sure a symtab is created for every file, even files
     which contain only variables (i.e. no code with associated
     line numbers).  */
...

Tested on x86_64-linux.

PR symtab/30265
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30265
---
 gdb/dwarf2/read.c                 | 3 +--
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/read.c b/gdb/dwarf2/read.c
index f39eba7a008..04bc0e1cbbd 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2/read.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2/read.c
@@ -9633,8 +9633,7 @@ handle_DW_AT_stmt_list (struct die_info *die, struct dwarf2_cu *cu,
      then there won't be any interesting code in the CU, but a check later on
      (in lnp_state_machine::check_line_address) will fail to properly exclude
      an entry that was removed via --gc-sections.  */
-  if (have_code)
-    dwarf_decode_lines (cu->line_header, cu, lowpc, decode_mapping);
+  dwarf_decode_lines (cu->line_header, cu, lowpc, decode_mapping && have_code);
 }
 
 /* Process DW_TAG_compile_unit or DW_TAG_partial_unit.  */
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp
index a67b4cd3736..049e88299da 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp
@@ -183,8 +183,10 @@ gdb_test "print test4.somewhere" "\\$\[0-9\].* = 3.14\[0-9\]*" "static const flo
 if { $non_dwarf } { setup_xfail *-*-* }
 gdb_test "info variable everywhere" \
     [multi_line \
+	 {All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":} \
+	 "" \
 	 "File (.*/)?m-static\[.\]h:" \
-	 "$decimal:\tconst int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;.*"]
+	 "$decimal:\tconst int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;"]
 
 # Perhaps at some point test4 should also include a test for a static
 # const int that was initialized in the header file.  But I'm not sure
-- 
2.35.3

Places

File gdb-symtab-fix-line-number-of-static-const-class-mem.patch of Package gdb (Revision f858c161cc424e8b285237d19fbccb81)

Places