File gdb-rhbz-2232086-generate-gdb-index-consistentl... of Package gdb

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File gdb-rhbz-2232086-generate-gdb-index-consistently.patch of Package gdb (Revision 3da18d111728577efef9e1d388d8b59d)

Currently displaying revision 3da18d111728577efef9e1d388d8b59d , Show latest

From FEDORA_PATCHES Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 12:04:36 +0000
Subject: gdb-rhbz-2232086-generate-gdb-index-consistently.patch

;; Back-port upstream commit aff250145af as part of a fix for
;; non-deterministic gdb-index generation (RH BZ 2232086).

gdb: generate gdb-index identically regardless of work thread count

It was observed that changing the number of worker threads that GDB
uses (maintenance set worker-threads NUM) would have an impact on the
layout of the generated gdb-index.

The cause seems to be how the CU are distributed between threads, and
then symbols that appear in multiple CU can be encountered earlier or
later depending on whether a particular CU moves between threads.

I certainly found this behaviour was reproducible when generating an
index for GDB itself, like:

gdb -q -nx -nh -batch \
      -eiex 'maint set worker-threads NUM' \
      -ex 'save gdb-index /tmp/'

And then setting different values for NUM will change the generated
index.

Now, the question is: does this matter?

I would like to suggest that yes, this does matter.  At Red Hat we
generate a gdb-index as part of the build process, and we would
ideally like to have reproducible builds: for the same source,
compiled with the same tool-chain, we should get the exact same output
binary.  And we do .... except for the index.

Now we could simply force GDB to only use a single worker thread when
we build the index, but, I don't think the idea of reproducible builds
is that strange, so I think we should ensure that our generated
indexes are always reproducible.

To achieve this, I propose that we add an extra step when building the
gdb-index file.  After constructing the initial symbol hash table
contents, we will pull all the symbols out of the hash, sort them,
then re-insert them in sorted order.  This will ensure that the
structure of the generated hash will remain consistent (given the same
set of symbols).

I've extended the existing index-file test to check that the generated
index doesn't change if we adjust the number of worker threads used.
Given that this test is already rather slow, I've only made one change
to the worker-thread count.  Maybe this test should be changed to use
a smaller binary, which is quicker to load, and for which we could
then try many different worker thread counts.

Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>

diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c b/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
--- a/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
@@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct mapped_symtab
   void add_index_entry (const char *name, int is_static,
 			gdb_index_symbol_kind kind, offset_type cu_index);
 
+  /* When entries are originally added into the data hash the order will
+     vary based on the number of worker threads GDB is configured to use.
+     This function will rebuild the hash such that the final layout will be
+     deterministic regardless of the number of worker threads used.  */
+
+  void sort ();
+
   /* Access the obstack.  */
   struct obstack *obstack ()
   { return &m_string_obstack; }
@@ -296,6 +303,65 @@ mapped_symtab::hash_expand ()
       }
 }
 
+/* See mapped_symtab class declaration.  */
+
+void mapped_symtab::sort ()
+{
+  /* Move contents out of this->data vector.  */
+  std::vector<symtab_index_entry> original_data = std::move (m_data);
+
+  /* Restore the size of m_data, this will avoid having to expand the hash
+     table (and rehash all elements) when we reinsert after sorting.
+     However, we do reset the element count, this allows for some sanity
+     checking asserts during the reinsert phase.  */
+  gdb_assert (m_data.size () == 0);
+  m_data.resize (original_data.size ());
+  m_element_count = 0;
+
+  /* Remove empty entries from ORIGINAL_DATA, this makes sorting quicker.  */
+  auto it = std::remove_if (original_data.begin (), original_data.end (),
+			    [] (const symtab_index_entry &entry) -> bool
+			    {
+			      return entry.name == nullptr;
+			    });
+  original_data.erase (it, original_data.end ());
+
+  /* Sort the existing contents.  */
+  std::sort (original_data.begin (), original_data.end (),
+	     [] (const symtab_index_entry &a,
+		 const symtab_index_entry &b) -> bool
+	     {
+	       /* Return true if A is before B.  */
+	       gdb_assert (a.name != nullptr);
+	       gdb_assert (b.name != nullptr);
+
+	       return strcmp (a.name, b.name) < 0;
+	     });
+
+  /* Re-insert each item from the sorted list.  */
+  for (auto &entry : original_data)
+    {
+      /* We know that ORIGINAL_DATA contains no duplicates, this data was
+	 taken from a hash table that de-duplicated entries for us, so
+	 count this as a new item.
+
+	 As we retained the original size of m_data (see above) then we
+	 should never need to grow m_data_ during this re-insertion phase,
+	 assert that now.  */
+      ++m_element_count;
+      gdb_assert (!this->hash_needs_expanding ());
+
+      /* Lookup a slot.  */
+      symtab_index_entry &slot = this->find_slot (entry.name);
+
+      /* As discussed above, we should not find duplicates.  */
+      gdb_assert (slot.name == nullptr);
+
+      /* Move this item into the slot we found.  */
+      slot = std::move (entry);
+    }
+}
+
 /* See class definition.  */
 
 void
@@ -1325,6 +1391,9 @@ write_gdbindex (dwarf2_per_objfile *per_objfile,
   for (auto map : table->get_addrmaps ())
     write_address_map (map, addr_vec, cu_index_htab);
 
+  /* Ensure symbol hash is built domestically.  */
+  symtab.sort ();
+
   /* Now that we've processed all symbols we can shrink their cu_indices
      lists.  */
   symtab.minimize ();
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.gdb/index-file.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.gdb/index-file.exp
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.gdb/index-file.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.gdb/index-file.exp
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ with_timeout_factor $timeout_factor {
     clean_restart $filename
 }
 
+# Record how many worker threads GDB is using.
+set worker_threads [gdb_get_worker_threads]
+
 # Generate an index file.
 set dir1 [standard_output_file "index_1"]
 remote_exec host "mkdir -p ${dir1}"
@@ -116,3 +119,41 @@ proc check_symbol_table_usage { filename } {
 
 set index_filename_base [file tail $filename]
 check_symbol_table_usage "$dir1/${index_filename_base}.gdb-index"
+
+# If GDB is using more than 1 worker thread then reduce the number of
+# worker threads, regenerate the index, and check that we get the same
+# index file back.  At one point the layout of the index would vary
+# based on the number of worker threads used.
+if { $worker_threads > 1 } {
+    # Start GDB, but don't load a file yet.
+    clean_restart
+
+    # Adjust the number of threads to use.
+    set reduced_threads [expr $worker_threads / 2]
+    gdb_test_no_output "maint set worker-threads $reduced_threads"
+
+    with_timeout_factor $timeout_factor {
+	# Now load the test binary.
+	gdb_file_cmd $filename
+    }
+
+    # Generate an index file.
+    set dir2 [standard_output_file "index_2"]
+    remote_exec host "mkdir -p ${dir2}"
+    with_timeout_factor $timeout_factor {
+	gdb_test_no_output "save gdb-index $dir2" \
+	    "create second gdb-index file"
+    }
+
+    # Close GDB.
+    gdb_exit
+
+    # Now check that the index files are identical.
+    foreach suffix { gdb-index  } {
+	set result \
+	    [remote_exec host \
+		 "cmp -s \"$dir1/${index_filename_base}.${suffix}\" \"$dir2/${index_filename_base}.${suffix}\""]
+	gdb_assert { [lindex $result 0] == 0 } \
+	    "$suffix files are identical"
+    }
+}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
@@ -9274,6 +9274,21 @@ proc gdb_step_until { regexp {test_name ""} {max_steps 10} } {
     }
 }
 
+# Return the number of worker threads that GDB is currently using.
+
+proc gdb_get_worker_threads { {testname ""} } {
+    set worker_threads "UNKNOWN"
+    gdb_test_multiple "maintenance show worker-threads" $testname {
+	-wrap -re "The number of worker threads GDB can use is unlimited \$currently ($::decimal)\$\\." {
+	    set worker_threads $expect_out(1,string)
+	}
+	-wrap -re "The number of worker threads GDB can use is ($::decimal)\\." {
+	    set worker_threads $expect_out(1,string)
+	}
+    }
+    return $worker_threads
+}
+
 # Check if the compiler emits epilogue information associated
 # with the closing brace or with the last statement line.
 #

Places

File gdb-rhbz-2232086-generate-gdb-index-consistently.patch of Package gdb (Revision 3da18d111728577efef9e1d388d8b59d)

Places