File openssl-fix-pod-syntax.diff of Package openssl-1_0_0

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File openssl-fix-pod-syntax.diff of Package openssl-1_0_0 (Revision f52e925b8cfc2cfa1d1c7f64c8abaeb7)

Currently displaying revision f52e925b8cfc2cfa1d1c7f64c8abaeb7 , Show latest

From jaenicke@openssl.net  Thu May 30 09:46:58 2013
CC: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
Resent-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 09:46:58 +0200
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3
Message-ID: <1369887573-10819-1-git-send-email-net147@gmail.com>
X-Received: by 10.68.65.134 with SMTP id x6mr5859535pbs.219.1369886755138; Wed, 29 May 2013 21:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-To: rt-i12@openssl.net
Received: by openssl.net (Postfix, from userid 29209) id 1548C1E0128; Thu, 30 May 2013 09:46:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by openssl.net (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 852471E12CB; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:14:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by openssl.net (Postfix, from userid 30009) id 6FF4D1E12CF; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:14:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from master.openssl.org (openssl.org [194.97.152.144]) by openssl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F491E12CB for <rt@openssl.net>; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:14:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by master.openssl.org (Postfix) id 53CEF1337D; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:14:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) by master.openssl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD43A1337C for <rt@openssl.org>; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:13:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 14so7525333pdc.39 for <rt@openssl.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 21:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 60-242-179-244.static.tpgi.com.au (60-242-179-244.static.tpgi.com.au. [60.242.179.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gh9sm39937623pbc.37.2013.05.29.21.05.52 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 29 May 2013 21:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: rt-i12@openssl.net
Subject: [PATCH] Fix POD errors with pod2man from Perl 5.18.
Resent-From: Lutz Jaenicke <jaenicke@openssl.net>
Return-Path: <jaenicke@openssl.net>
X-Original-To: rt-i12@openssl.net
X-Original-To: jaenicke@localhost
X-Original-To: rt@openssl.net
Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer; bh=7+ASUI5nk0djFCejseoyvHdfe1CBnwkjfwtKd/NZiyk=; b=Z8nPd4yIaqDTqC2lMbn6p2B4+cFrVY1CLkKn7W9dJucX5NWdr9xJFx3uBZgzONU48L 24eHjFUMScQtRepL0UbNbWOeUlLsTFicuSlx9FaEyK7ZY7zVzmdESmGeedInheWRaaz1 A818XmhAGYTO09kxRTrt8lswyegygIMna7vvjV5vP7wdRPLBejxvtSj24xz+b6bEub51 CvG+wjG+5SZt3XYdGtE3Rff49BaZg4zjpcH92H64bPsKClFx0dOYP849mEMuMzDsrcAO /2ZtXsPfkOHXSJAgGvvxEo7KQTUJol5+VtHzNjY7rRnrpKmS7U0+U8sasp4yetFIuXSZ U+eg==
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:19:33 +1000
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Greylist: delayed 483 seconds by postgrey-1.33 at master.openssl.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:13:59 CEST
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on openssl
Resent-Message-ID: <20130530074658.GA13997@openssl.net>
To: rt@openssl.org
From: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
X-RT-Original-Encoding: ascii
content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: 12835

Index: openssl-1.0.2a/doc/apps/ts.pod
===================================================================
--- openssl-1.0.2a.orig/doc/apps/ts.pod	2015-04-03 22:07:02.024077520 +0200
+++ openssl-1.0.2a/doc/apps/ts.pod	2015-04-03 22:07:04.830116325 +0200
@@ -58,19 +58,19 @@ time. Here is a brief description of the
 
 =over 4
 
-=item 1.
+=item Z<>1.
 
 The TSA client computes a one-way hash value for a data file and sends
 the hash to the TSA.
 
-=item 2.
+=item Z<>2.
 
 The TSA attaches the current date and time to the received hash value,
 signs them and sends the time stamp token back to the client. By
 creating this token the TSA certifies the existence of the original
 data file at the time of response generation.
 
-=item 3.
+=item Z<>3.
 
 The TSA client receives the time stamp token and verifies the
 signature on it. It also checks if the token contains the same hash
Index: openssl-1.0.2a/doc/crypto/rand.pod
===================================================================
--- openssl-1.0.2a.orig/doc/crypto/rand.pod	2015-04-03 22:07:02.025077534 +0200
+++ openssl-1.0.2a/doc/crypto/rand.pod	2015-04-03 22:07:04.830116325 +0200
@@ -74,16 +74,16 @@ First up I will state the things I belie
 
 =over 4
 
-=item 1
+=item Z<>1
 
 A good hashing algorithm to mix things up and to convert the RNG 'state'
 to random numbers.
 
-=item 2
+=item Z<>2
 
 An initial source of random 'state'.
 
-=item 3
+=item Z<>3
 
 The state should be very large.  If the RNG is being used to generate
 4096 bit RSA keys, 2 2048 bit random strings are required (at a minimum).
@@ -93,13 +93,13 @@ carried away on this last point but it d
 a bad idea to keep quite a lot of RNG state.  It should be easier to
 break a cipher than guess the RNG seed data.
 
-=item 4
+=item Z<>4
 
 Any RNG seed data should influence all subsequent random numbers
 generated.  This implies that any random seed data entered will have
 an influence on all subsequent random numbers generated.
 
-=item 5
+=item Z<>5
 
 When using data to seed the RNG state, the data used should not be
 extractable from the RNG state.  I believe this should be a
@@ -108,12 +108,12 @@ data would be a private key or a passwor
 not be disclosed by either subsequent random numbers or a
 'core' dump left by a program crash.
 
-=item 6
+=item Z<>6
 
 Given the same initial 'state', 2 systems should deviate in their RNG state
 (and hence the random numbers generated) over time if at all possible.
 
-=item 7
+=item Z<>7
 
 Given the random number output stream, it should not be possible to determine
 the RNG state or the next random number.

Places

File openssl-fix-pod-syntax.diff of Package openssl-1_0_0 (Revision f52e925b8cfc2cfa1d1c7f64c8abaeb7)

Places