File gdb-testsuite-make-gdb.base-solib-search.exp-mo... of Package gdb

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File gdb-testsuite-make-gdb.base-solib-search.exp-more-ro.patch of Package gdb (Revision e118954a7b5ee9a56c9e519ce0b644b1)

Currently displaying revision e118954a7b5ee9a56c9e519ce0b644b1 , Show latest

From 17ab80b7af4c388c44d0981d76de396d85bcba76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:37:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 05/48] [gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.base/solib-search.exp more
 robust

On aarch64-linux, with gcc 13.2.1, I run into:
...
 (gdb) backtrace^M
 #0  break_here () at solib-search.c:30^M
 #1  0x0000fffff7f20194 in lib2_func4 () at solib-search-lib2.c:50^M
 #2  0x0000fffff7f70194 in lib1_func3 () at solib-search-lib1.c:50^M
 #3  0x0000fffff7f20174 in lib2_func2 () at solib-search-lib2.c:30^M
 #4  0x0000fffff7f70174 in lib1_func1 () at solib-search-lib1.c:30^M
 #5  0x00000000004101b4 in main () at solib-search.c:23^M
 (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/solib-search.exp: \
   backtrace (with wrong libs) (data collection)
 FAIL: gdb.base/solib-search.exp: backtrace (with wrong libs)
...

The FAIL is generated by this code in the test-case:
...
    if { $expect_fail } {
	# If the backtrace output is correct the test isn't sufficiently
	# testing what it should.
	if { $count == $total_expected } {
	    set fail 1
	}
...

The test-case:
- builds two versions of two shared libs, a "right" and "wrong" version, the
  difference being an additional dummy function (called spacer function),
- uses the "right" version to generate a core file,
- uses the "wrong" version to interpret the core file, and
- generates a backtrace.

The intent is that the backtrace is incorrect due to using the "wrong"
version, but actually it's correct.  This is because the spacer functions
aren't large enough.

Fix this by increasing the size of the spacer functions by adding a dummy
loop, after which we have, as expected, an incorrect backtrace:
...
 (gdb) backtrace^M
 #0  break_here () at solib-search.c:30^M
 #1  0x0000fffff7f201c0 in ?? ()^M
 #2  0x0000fffff7f20174 in lib2_func2 () at solib-search-lib2.c:30^M
 #3  0x0000fffff7f20174 in lib2_func2 () at solib-search-lib2.c:30^M
 #4  0x0000fffff7f70174 in lib1_func1 () at solib-search-lib1.c:30^M
 #5  0x00000000004101b4 in main () at solib-search.c:23^M
 (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/solib-search.exp: \
   backtrace (with wrong libs) (data collection)
 PASS: gdb.base/solib-search.exp: backtrace (with wrong libs)
...

Tested on aarch64-linux.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib1.c | 3 +++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib2.c | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib1.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib1.c
index 76338a8e216..6a4cc9aa1a7 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib1.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib1.c
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ lib1_func1 (void)
 void
 lib1_spacer (void)
 {
+  int i;
+  for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
+    ;
 }
 
 #endif
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib2.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib2.c
index bf7c7bd071c..fb004d7377f 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib2.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/solib-search-lib2.c
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ lib2_func2 (void)
 void
 lib2_spacer (void)
 {
+  int i;
+  for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
+    ;
 }
 
 #endif
-- 
2.35.3

Places

File gdb-testsuite-make-gdb.base-solib-search.exp-more-ro.patch of Package gdb (Revision e118954a7b5ee9a56c9e519ce0b644b1)

Places