This request is superseded by
request 921789
(Show diff)
You're not reviewing the full diff of
request 921218
, but the diff to the superseded
request 918658
(Show full diff)
Overview
Request 921218 superseded
- Mark the package split dicts into dicts and dicts-devel as such
- Smaller cleanups
- Created by WernerFink
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 918658
- Superseded by 921789
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:2
Loading...
reviewer
found conflict of dicts-1.5-421.5.x86_64 with dicts-devel-1.5-1.1.x86_64 /usr/share/doc/packages/dicts/README.dicts /usr/src/dicts/Makefile.template /usr/src/dicts/fix8bit.c /usr/src/dicts/template.el /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/COPYING /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/E.ispell /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/LC_CTYPE /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/Makefile /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/Makefile.pdicts /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/README /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/br.aff /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/br.aff.pdicts /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/br.ispell /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/conjugue /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/conjugue.1 /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/conjugue.man /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/v.ispell /usr/src/dicts/br.ispell-2.4/verbos /usr/src/dicts/dutch96/LC_CTYPE /usr/src/dicts/dutch96/Makefile /usr/src/dicts/dutch96/README /usr/src/dicts/dutch96/affixes.pl /usr/src/dicts/dutch96/dutch96.aff /usr/src/dicts/dutch96/dutch96.aff.pdicts
Login required, please
login
in order to comment
Request History
WernerFink created request
- Mark the package split dicts into dicts and dicts-devel as such
- Smaller cleanups
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
dimstar_suse added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:2 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:2"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:2"
licensedigger accepted review
ok
dimstar accepted review
superseded by 921789
Users of the existing dicts package will get the new dicts-devel recommended, but dicts-devel does not obsolete dicts (which no longer exists) - this is a classical package rename - not a package split (for which case the split provides you used would make more sense)