Rxvt X Terminal with Unicode Support

Edit Package rxvt-unicode
http://software.schmorp.de/#rxvt-unicode

rxvt-unicode is a clone of the well-known terminal emulator rxvt,
modified to store text in Unicode (either UCS-2 or UCS-4) and to use
locale-correct input and output. It also supports mixing multiple fonts
at the same time, including Xft fonts.

Authors:
--------
Marc Lehmann

Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
Filename Size Changed
confirm-paste-Change-y-p-n-to-y-f-n-to-preserve-comp.patch 0000002712 2.65 KB
dont-set-empty-local.patch 0000000450 450 Bytes
handle-new-tic-and-dont-install-terminfo.patch 0000001149 1.12 KB
rxvt-unicode-0001-Prefer-XDG_RUNTIME_DIR-over-the-HOME.patch 0000000792 792 Bytes
rxvt-unicode-256color.desktop 0000000286 286 Bytes
rxvt-unicode-9.20-CVE-2008-1142-DISPLAY.patch 0000000992 992 Bytes
rxvt-unicode-9.21-xsubpp.patch 0000000660 660 Bytes
rxvt-unicode-9.31.tar.bz2 0000880148 860 KB
rxvt-unicode-9.31.tar.bz2.sig 0000000163 163 Bytes
rxvt-unicode-hardening.patch 0000000477 477 Bytes
rxvt-unicode-rpmlintrc 0000000048 48 Bytes
rxvt-unicode-secondarywheel.patch 0000004537 4.43 KB
rxvt-unicode.README.SuSE 0000001001 1001 Bytes
rxvt-unicode.changes 0000067580 66 KB
rxvt-unicode.desktop 0000000245 245 Bytes
rxvt-unicode.spec 0000006267 6.12 KB
Revision 59 (latest revision is 67)
Marcus Rueckert's avatar Marcus Rueckert (darix) committed (revision 59)
add missing bugreference
Comments 4

Michael Pujos's avatar

With the recent update, the 256color version of the binaries are all missing in the generated RPM (urxvt-256color, urxvtc-256color, urxvtd-256color, ....)


Aleksander Miera's avatar

This is because of install cleaning the buildroot, then building and installing 88 color version. Not sure though if this is related to a specific version of rpmbuild or spec file itself.


Aleksander Miera's avatar

I have managed to tackle the problem mentioned by @bobbie424242 by adding: %define __spec_install_pre %{___build_pre}\ %{__mkdir_p} "%{dirname:%{buildroot}}"\ %{__mkdir_p} "%{buildroot}"\ %{nil} (sorry, formatting went wrong) at the top of the spec file. Works, but I'm not sure if this is a "kocher" way to handle. Looks like the problem is related to definition of this macro in /usr/lib/rpm/platform/x86_64-linux (rpm package).


Marcus Rueckert's avatar

I would rather fix the build that it works without overriding the macro.

In doubt we can just use a _multibuild file to to build the 256color version

openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by