google-noto-fonts
No description set
- Developed at M17N:fonts
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
3
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:ILP32/google-noto-fonts && cd $_
- Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
Filename | Size | Changed |
---|---|---|
NotoFonts-hinted-2013-04-11.tgz | 0003275115 3.12 MB | |
NotoFonts-unhinted-2013-04-18.tgz | 0001395138 1.33 MB | |
generate-specfile.sh | 0000002994 2.92 KB | |
google-noto-fonts.changes | 0000000332 332 Bytes | |
google-noto-fonts.spec | 0000028555 27.9 KB | |
google-noto-fonts.spec.in | 0000002331 2.28 KB |
Revision 2 (latest revision is 34)
Adrian Schröter (adrianSuSE)
committed
(revision 2)
Split 13.2 from Factory
Comments 4
Should this package be named as "noto-fonts"? Because all its sub-packages are prefiexed with noto- rather than google-noto-
Most font packages are prefixed with the name of the vendor/group/foundry. https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Fonts#Naming_and_Central_Font_Repository
If it should be prefixed with google-noto-, then all sub-packages should have the same prefix. It is a problem of inconsistent naming.
I would agree.