google-noto-fonts
No description set
- Developed at M17N:fonts
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
3
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP4:FactoryCandidates/google-noto-fonts && cd $_ - Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
| Filename | Size | Changed |
|---|---|---|
| README.FAQ | 0000000812 812 Bytes | |
| README.maintain | 0000001174 1.15 KB | |
| _constraints | 0000000109 109 Bytes | |
| generate-specfile.sh | 0000009238 9.02 KB | |
| google-noto-fonts.changes | 0000010850 10.6 KB | |
| google-noto-fonts.spec | 0000177242 173 KB | |
| google-noto-fonts.spec.in | 0000002475 2.42 KB | |
|
notofonts.github.io-noto-monthly-release-24.1.1.ta |
1062706467 1010 MB |
Revision 27 (latest revision is 34)
Ana Guerrero (anag+factory)
accepted
request 1137228
from
Jan Engelhardt (jengelh)
(revision 27)
fwd rq 1137202
Comments 4
Should this package be named as "noto-fonts"? Because all its sub-packages are prefiexed with noto- rather than google-noto-
Most font packages are prefixed with the name of the vendor/group/foundry. https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Fonts#Naming_and_Central_Font_Repository
If it should be prefixed with google-noto-, then all sub-packages should have the same prefix. It is a problem of inconsistent naming.
I would agree.