python-numpydoc
No description set
- Developed at devel:languages:python:numeric
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
3
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout openSUSE:Factory:Rebuild/python-numpydoc && cd $_
- Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
Filename | Size | Changed |
---|---|---|
numpydoc-1.6.0.tar.gz | 0000085475 83.5 KB | |
numpydoc-pr523-py312deprecation.patch | 0000000755 755 Bytes | |
python-numpydoc.changes | 0000018483 18 KB | |
python-numpydoc.spec | 0000003209 3.13 KB | |
python-objects.inv | 0000136102 133 KB |
Revision 14 (latest revision is 15)
Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar_suse)
accepted
request 1154144
from
Matej Cepl (mcepl)
(revision 14)
Forwarded request #1153590 from bnavigator - Update to 1.6.0 * Requires Python 3.8+ and Sphinx 5+. ## Closed issues * `numpydoc ignore` inline comment not recognized when using decorators #495 * Align pre-commit and Sphinx rule override syntax #466 * Use pyproject.toml #473 * circleci-artifacts-redirector-action error #469 * Incorporate a pre-commit hook for numpydoc validation #450 * PR06 fails when offending type name is used only as a substring #446 * style of [1] is strange in numpydoc docs #443 * Double click on function parameter selects parameter type as well #427 ## Merged pull requests * BUG: validator now handles properties #500 (sdiebolt) * Fix clean_backref for extensions that have backrefs to inline elements. #499 (mcmtroffaes) * BUG: validator now handles decorators #496 (sdiebolt) * TST: Test no-file for source #493 (larsoner) * Update pydata-sphinx-theme #490 (jarrodmillman) * Sync updates to generate_requirements.py from scikit-image #485 (mwtoews) * Generate requirements files from pyproject.toml #483 (mwtoews) * Add token for artifact redirector #470 (jarrodmillman) * Use rtd template (old method is deprecated) #468 (jarrodmillman) * Drop Python 3.7 #462 (jarrodmillman) * Require Sphinx 5+ #461 (jarrodmillman) * Pre-commit hook for running numpydoc validation #454
Comments 0