Photutils
Photutils is an affiliated package of Astropy to provide tools for detecting and performing photometry of astronomical sources.
- Developed at devel:languages:python:numeric
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
2
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout openSUSE:Factory:Rebuild/python-photutils && cd $_
- Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
Filename | Size | Changed |
---|---|---|
photutils-2.0.2.tar.gz | 0000704484 688 KB | |
python-photutils.changes | 0000069155 67.5 KB | |
python-photutils.spec | 0000003008 2.94 KB |
Latest Revision
Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar_suse)
accepted
request 1222854
from
Benjamin Greiner (bnavigator)
(revision 26)
- Update to 2.0.2 ## Bug Fixes * Due to an upstream bug in bottleneck with float32 arrays, bottleneck nan-functions are now used internally only for float64 arrays. Performance may be impacted for computations involving arrays with dtype other than float64. Affected functions are used in the aperture, background, detection, profiles, psf, and segmentation subpackages. This change has no impact if bottleneck is not installed. ### photutils.background * Fixed a bug in Background2D where an error would be raised when using the BkgIDWInterpolator interpolator when any mesh was excluded, e.g., due to an input mask. [#1940] ### photutils.detection * Fixed a bug in the star finders (DAOStarFinder, IRAFStarFinder, and StarFinder) when exclude_border=True. Also, fixed an issue with exclude_border=True where if all sources were in the border region then an error would be raised. [#1943] - Release 2.0.1 ## Bug Fixes ### photutils.background * Fixed a bug in SExtractorBackground where the dimensionality of the returned value would not be preserved if the output was a single value. [#1934] * Fixed an issue in Background2D where if the box_size equals the input array shape the input data array could be modified. [#1935] - Release 2.0.0 ## General * The regions package is now an optional dependency. [#1813]
Comments 0