python-keystoneclient
This is a client for the OpenStack Keystone API. There's a Python API (the keystoneclient module), and a command-line script (keystone). The Keystone 2.0 API is still a moving target, so this module will remain in "Beta" status until the API is finalized and fully implemented.
- Developed at Cloud:OpenStack:Factory
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
4
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout openSUSE:Leap:16.0:FactoryCandidates/python-keystoneclient && cd $_
- Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
Filename | Size | Changed |
---|---|---|
_service | 0000000714 714 Bytes | |
python-keystoneclient-3.19.0.tar.gz | 0000314873 307 KB | |
python-keystoneclient.changes | 0000111377 109 KB | |
python-keystoneclient.spec | 0000003954 3.86 KB |
Revision 30 (latest revision is 40)
Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar_suse)
accepted
request 692832
from
Dirk Mueller (dirkmueller)
(revision 30)
- update to version 3.19.0 - Switch to stestr - Deprecate region enabled parameter - refactor the getid method in keystoneclient/base.py - Use python3 for functional tests - import zuul job settings from project-config - Add release note link in README - Add Response class to return request-id to caller - Add py36 tox environment - Change openstack-dev to openstack-discuss - Fix keystoneclient-devstack-functional job - Update reno for stable/rocky - Don't quote {posargs} in tox.ini - add python 3.6 unit test job - Add return-request-id-to-caller function(v3/contrib) - Import legacy keystoneclient-dsvm-functional - Add Python 3.6 classifier to setup.cfg - add lib-forward-testing-python3 test job - Make the functional test voting - Convert functional tests to Zuulv3 - switch documentation job to new PTI - Add return-request-id-to-caller function(v3) - fix misspelling of 'default' - Update hacking version - Update IdentityProviderManager docstring - Add release notes for return-request-id-to-caller - add python 3.7 unit test job - Use templates for cover and lower-constraints
Comments 0