Telegram Desktop
A new era of messaging.
- Developed at server:messaging
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
4
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout openSUSE:Slowroll:Base:1/telegram-desktop && cd $_ - Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
| Filename | Size | Changed |
|---|---|---|
| GSL-master.zip | 0000078172 76.3 KB | |
| _constraints | 0000000130 130 Bytes | |
| breakpad-master.tar.gz | 0005213846 4.97 MB | |
| catch.hpp | 0000422383 412 KB | |
| crl-master.zip | 0000044789 43.7 KB | |
| gyp-master.tar.gz | 0000627010 612 KB | |
| libtgvoip.zip | 0002042747 1.95 MB | |
| linux-syscall-support-refs-heads-master.tar.gz | 0000034552 33.7 KB | |
| lz4-dev.zip | 0000380587 372 KB | |
| patch.py | 0000012783 12.5 KB | |
| range-v3-master.zip | 0000833965 814 KB | |
| rlottie-master.zip | 0008033628 7.66 MB | |
| tdesktop.patch | 0000007395 7.22 KB | |
| telegram-desktop.changes | 0000025387 24.8 KB | |
| telegram-desktop.spec | 0000010199 9.96 KB | |
| v1.8.2.tar.gz | 0014335232 13.7 MB | |
| variant-master.zip | 0000141553 138 KB | |
| xxHash-master.zip | 0000057956 56.6 KB |
Revision 20 (latest revision is 125)
Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar_suse)
accepted
request 725644
from
M K (tux93)
(revision 20)
Update to 1.8.2
Comments 4
Hey Dominique and Marcel, any news about the upcoming updates? The official build is currently 2.7.0 so I wondered if you guys needed a hand. Perhaps I can help if you show me the ropes :)
Hey, sadly I haven't managed a successful build since the release of 2.6.x, if you want to help feel free to have a look at my branch and send SRs / patches my way or to the server:messaging repo directly
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:tux93/telegram-desktop
I barely started getting into packaging so sorry if I am stating the obvious, but isn't your error log like the error log you would get if
../Telegram/ThirdParty/tgcalls/tgcalls/group/StreamingPart.hdidn't have access tocstdint? There's definitely something fishy about a basic type annotation like that not being parsed appropriately.This is no place for requests, see the top directory's comment. Use the devel projects instead which hold the package maintainers, or the mailing list, or the bugzilla and stop posting comments here please.