Overview

Request 1080504 accepted

- Correction of license should be LGPL-2.0-only and GFDL-1.1-only
* confirmed with suse legal

Lubos Kocman's avatar
Lubos Kocman (lkocman) -
author

Discussion with me and Christopher De Nicolo:

libgarcon https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/347021#file-12007858238

The copying says it's LGPL-2.0 and docs are GDF while specs claims it's GPL-2.0 or later. See https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/347021#file-12007858238

That doesn't sound fully right to me.

You are right: license tag should be „LGPL-2.0-only and GFDL-1.1-only"

Maurizio Galli's avatar
Maurizio Galli (mauriziogalli) -
target maintainer

Thanks Lubos!

Request History
Lubos Kocman's avatar

lkocman created request

- Correction of license should be LGPL-2.0-only and GFDL-1.1-only
* confirmed with suse legal

Manfred Hollstein's avatar

manfred-h accepted request

lgtm, thanks for the legal review!

openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by
Places