Overview
Request 1080764 superseded
- Fix packaging issue.
- Update to 0.3.0:
* Now it's possible to replace view direction shaders via ShowMySky API
without re-creating the renderer. This lets Stellarium switch between
projections while implementing them in fragment shaders for better image quality.
* CMake configuration modules are now installed in paths like /usr/lib/cmake/ShowMySky-Qt6
instead of /usr/lib/ShowMySky-Qt6/cmake.
- Created by polslinux
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 1080147
- Superseded by 1080857
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:26
I'm not sure how to interpret this error message :thinking: What should I do?
Request History
polslinux created request
- Fix packaging issue.
- Update to 0.3.0:
* Now it's possible to replace view direction shaders via ShowMySky API
without re-creating the renderer. This lets Stellarium switch between
projections while implementing them in fragment shaders for better image quality.
* CMake configuration modules are now installed in paths like /usr/lib/cmake/ShowMySky-Qt6
instead of /usr/lib/ShowMySky-Qt6/cmake.
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
dimstar_suse added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:26"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:26"
licensedigger accepted review
ok
dimstar declined review
+# fix packaging issue that was done when package was created
+Provides: libShowMySky-Qt6-14 = %{version}
+Obsoletes: libShowMySky-Qt6-14 < %{version}
That fix seems it was more tailored at fixing the wrong name of the -devel package!? so it should provide/obsolete the wrong -devel package name
dimstar declined request
+# fix packaging issue that was done when package was created
+Provides: libShowMySky-Qt6-14 = %{version}
+Obsoletes: libShowMySky-Qt6-14 < %{version}
That fix seems it was more tailored at fixing the wrong name of the -devel package!? so it should provide/obsolete the wrong -devel package name
That fix seems it was more tailored at fixing the wrong name of the -devel package!? so it should provide/obsolete the wrong -devel package name
you're right, nice catch!