Overview
Request 1100863 accepted
- Update to version 2.0.0
* License changed to MIT.
* Previously, mold could not produce an object file with more than 65520 sections
using the --relocatable option. Now the bug has been fixed. (2e8bd0b)
* mold now interprets -undefined as a synonym for --undefined instead of -u
ndefined. This seems inconsistent, as -ufoo is generally treated as -u foo
(which is an alias for --undefined foo), but this is the behavior of the GNU
linkers and LLVM lld, so we prioritize compatibility over consistency.
* -nopie is now handled as a synonym for --no-pie.
* [RISC-V] R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128 and R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128 relocation types are now
supported (4bffe26, 1ac5fe7)
* [PPC64] R_PPC64_REL32 relocation type is now supported. (ebd780e)
Request History
marxin created request
- Update to version 2.0.0
* License changed to MIT.
* Previously, mold could not produce an object file with more than 65520 sections
using the --relocatable option. Now the bug has been fixed. (2e8bd0b)
* mold now interprets -undefined as a synonym for --undefined instead of -u
ndefined. This seems inconsistent, as -ufoo is generally treated as -u foo
(which is an alias for --undefined foo), but this is the behavior of the GNU
linkers and LLVM lld, so we prioritize compatibility over consistency.
* -nopie is now handled as a synonym for --no-pie.
* [RISC-V] R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128 and R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128 relocation types are now
supported (4bffe26, 1ac5fe7)
* [PPC64] R_PPC64_REL32 relocation type is now supported. (ebd780e)
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
staging-bot added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:13 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:13"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:13"
darix declined request
mrueckert wrote (1100863),wrong license
anag+factory reopened request
Reopened via staging workflow.
anag+factory added factory-staging as a reviewer
Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"
anag+factory accepted review
Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:13"
anag+factory declined request
Declined via staging workflow.
marxin reopened request
staging-bot added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:41"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:41"
licensedigger accepted review
The legal review is accepted preliminary. The package may require actions later on.
darix accepted review
Accepted review for by_group opensuse-review-team request 1100863 from user staging-bot
anag+factory accepted review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:41 got accepted.
anag+factory approved review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:41 got accepted.
anag+factory accepted request
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:41 got accepted.
@darix
wrong license?
Upstream claims:
and the spec file accordingly adjusts to MIT... so you say upstream claims wrong?
See also https://github.com/rui314/mold/commit/a066fe25c6f9ccab11cd07345241492af70d6583
I think I adjusted the license accordingly to upstream, please see the release note: https://github.com/rui314/mold/releases/tag/v2.0.0
@dimstar: Do you know why was the SR rejected in Staging project?
@marxin Do you mean this SR? I removed it from staging when darix declined it. Just open a new one when you update the licence.
No, beats me why @darix declined it.
To me the license looked in line (bit I did not check legalen)