Overview

Request 1123464 superseded

Replacement for the no longer functioning streamdeck-ui package, which can be staged to be deleted alongside this request


Ana Guerrero's avatar

@simotek lots of files are duplicated in streamdeck-linux-gui-3.2.0-1.1.noarch and streamdeck-ui-2.0.15-2.1.noarch::

found conflict of streamdeck-linux-gui-3.2.0-1.1.noarch with streamdeck-ui-2.0.15-2.1.noarch
  /usr/bin/streamdeck
  /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/streamdeck_ui/fonts/roboto/LICENSE.txt
  /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/streamdeck_ui/fonts/roboto/Roboto-Black.ttf
  /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/streamdeck_ui/fonts/roboto/Roboto-BlackItalic.ttf
...
etc

Michal Suchanek's avatar

Even if the previous package is to be deleted conflicts/replaces should be added to facilitate upgrade.



Simon Lees's avatar
author reviewer source maintainer

Sorry there was a version with the conflicts / obsoletes etc I don't really know why obs decided to submit this version instead.

Request History
Simon Lees's avatar

simotek created request

Replacement for the no longer functioning streamdeck-ui package, which can be staged to be deleted alongside this request


Factory Auto's avatar

factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer

Please review sources


Factory Auto's avatar

factory-auto accepted review

Check script succeeded


Saul Goodman's avatar

licensedigger accepted review

ok


Staging Bot's avatar

staging-bot added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:20 as a reviewer

Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:20"


Staging Bot's avatar

staging-bot accepted review

Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:20"


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar declined review

Even if the previous package is to be deleted conflicts/replaces should be added to facilitate upgrade.

There is nothing to add to this statement. Especially as the two conflict on install, declaring the new package as a proper upgrade replacement sounds nothing but correct


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar declined request

Even if the previous package is to be deleted conflicts/replaces should be added to facilitate upgrade.

There is nothing to add to this statement. Especially as the two conflict on install, declaring the new package as a proper upgrade replacement sounds nothing but correct


Ana Guerrero's avatar

anag+factory reopened request

Reopened via staging workflow.


Ana Guerrero's avatar

anag+factory added factory-staging as a reviewer

Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"


Ana Guerrero's avatar

anag+factory accepted review

Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:20"


Ana Guerrero's avatar

anag+factory declined request

Declined via staging workflow.


Michal Suchanek's avatar

michals superseded request

superseded by 1124812

openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by