Loading...
Request History
pluskalm created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
ok
anag+factory added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:18"
anag+factory accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:18"
dimstar accepted review
anag+factory accepted review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:18 got accepted.
anag+factory approved review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:18 got accepted.
anag+factory accepted request
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:18 got accepted.
That change feels wrong - pkgconfig(libattr) is the right thing to use. What issue is/was there seen on 15.6? If 'have choice' due to package rename in the layering, then I think this should be addressed in prjconf
@mlin7442 - do you know anything about that?
The build issue (unresolvable) on Leap 15.6 is that
libattr-develbuilt fromSUSE:SLE-15:Update/attrdoes not providepkgconfig(libattr), as introduced by SR#631597. Thelibattr-develrequirement has been inopenSUSE:Factory/daruntil my change in SR#1121956. This restores compatibility with Leap.Thanks for the explanation... we only had it for 5 years... looking forward to ALP :)
We could make it a version conditional and then have the generation succeeding us drop it?
Is an option - but imho as long as at least the package name matches, I'd not overcomplicate it with conditionals.
this could have been solved via maint update, could it not?
add a pkgconfig providing to libattr-devel via a maint update? yes, it's an option.