This request supersedes:
request 1122972
(Show diff)
Overview
Loading...
@cyphar, @dcassany, @dirkmueller, @flavio_castelli, @mjura, @mssola: review reminder
Login required, please
login
in order to comment
@cyphar, @dcassany, @dirkmueller, @flavio_castelli, @mjura, @mssola: review reminder
I was going to package this once it was clear how we wanted to deal with migrations from LXD to incus. As the person who did the original incus fork, and has maintained the LXD package for a while, I would prefer to be in charge of packaging incus. I was hoping we could avoid having two copies of the same packaging scripts.
Also, this package is based off of the LXD package I wrote, but there's no reference in the changelog to where the original packaging sources came from.
You can definitely take charge if you want, I just saw it as an opportunity to see how far my packaging skills go. And sorry I totally forgot to add that this was based on the LXD packaging, which was also made by you.
I thought to myself, as 6.0 is close to release, that that could be a good transition point if you don't want to support LXD anymore (as far as I can read into what stgraber wants to do. As he doesn't want to support transition possible for too long, it seems like 6.0 sounds something reasonable?)