Overview
Request 1134201 superseded
Needed by QGIS3.34
- Created by dstoecker
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 1134171
- Superseded by 1134612
-
Open review for
opensuse-review-team
-
Open review for
factory-staging
The guidelines specifies this the other way around:
- the devel-static requires -devel
- -devel does NOT require -devel-static
- Any consumer linking the static lib is responsible to pull it in (like this, we can identify all the consumers of the static lib)
Hmm. I didn't make the package, but it looked ok. Seems I overlooked some issues ;-)
Request History
dstoecker created request
Needed by QGIS3.34
anag+factory added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:22"
anag+factory accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:22"
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
ok
dimstar accepted review
jengelh declined review
this submit not SLPP-ified (but doable - cf 1134234)
jengelh declined request
this submit not SLPP-ified (but doable - cf 1134234)
anag+factory reopened request
Reopened via staging workflow.
anag+factory added factory-staging as a reviewer
Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"
anag+factory accepted review
Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:22"
anag+factory declined request
Declined via staging workflow.
Sorry, missed that before... preferably this would be split according to SLPP - there is a devel package so there is a chance that stuff starts linking this,.
It's not a toolchain component, so extra scrutiny for even having devel-static in the first place. Please see if QGIS is ok if all is shared-only.
I think QGIS is ok without static. If dropping that is needed for Factory I have to contact the original author, as that's something else than mainly "fixing".
Built qgis, looks good. SR for draco is out now.
Please in "understandable". I have no idea what you mean.