Any reason why? I don't see one in the bug report

Christophe Marin (krop) - 9 months ago

author target maintainer

wrong bug ref, it's https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217189

---

Christophe Marin (krop) - 9 months ago

author target maintainer

"However I believe that the pam_loginuid.so does not belong in there. This is only supposed to be used for "entry applications" like login, gdm etc. But kscreenlocker isn't an entry application, or is it?"

---

Fabian Vogt (favogt) - 9 months ago

Yeah, kscreenlocker doesn't perform any session management so this is effectively a noop

I originally gave it a +1 but then I looked at the BR and there's no mention there.

Not directly related, but unlike fprintd_pam, pam_pkcs11 doesn't 'Supplements' anything