Overview
Request 1155995 accepted
- red hat bug 1645856 missing sysmacros include fixed
- Use %patch -P N instead of deprecated %patchN.
- Instruct bnd tools not to include non-reproducible headers in
manifest
- Do not build with liblock support (bsc#1212801)
- Added patch:
* rxtx-yield.patch
+ fix 'yield' becoming a restricted identifier in Java 13
- Do not force building of javadoc with source level 8
- Require java >= 1.8 for building
- Build javadoc with source level 8 to prevent problems with
"yield' becoming a restricted identifier in Java 13
- Define %%make_build for systems that don't have it defined in
rpm macros
- Do not distribute the sources.
- Do not distribute the headers since the shared libraries are not
meant to be linked with, but they are dlopened from the Java
code
- Do not distribute javadoc as a zip file but as directory in order
to be usable directly
- Install the java jars into a platform dependent location, since
they are having JNI calls
Request History
fschuett created request
- red hat bug 1645856 missing sysmacros include fixed
- Use %patch -P N instead of deprecated %patchN.
- Instruct bnd tools not to include non-reproducible headers in
manifest
- Do not build with liblock support (bsc#1212801)
- Added patch:
* rxtx-yield.patch
+ fix 'yield' becoming a restricted identifier in Java 13
- Do not force building of javadoc with source level 8
- Require java >= 1.8 for building
- Build javadoc with source level 8 to prevent problems with
"yield' becoming a restricted identifier in Java 13
- Define %%make_build for systems that don't have it defined in
rpm macros
- Do not distribute the sources.
- Do not distribute the headers since the shared libraries are not
meant to be linked with, but they are dlopened from the Java
code
- Do not distribute javadoc as a zip file but as directory in order
to be usable directly
- Install the java jars into a platform dependent location, since
they are having JNI calls
fschuett accepted request
fixes error mentioned in redhat bugzilla