Overview
Request 1185198 accepted
new package falcosidekick: simple daemon for connecting Falco to your ecosystem
- Created by ojkastl_buildservice
- In state accepted
-
Package maintainer:
ojkastl_buildservice
- Supersedes 1174283
This is related to the Falco threat detection cloud native security solution. So I thought security would be a good fit.
yes it's a good fit. Why do you set NO_BRP_STRIP_DEBUG?
Because I set that in all of the Go packages I maintain.
And that is because it was recommended. IIRC Jeff wanted to check if that recommendation still stands, but I have not heard back.
See this thread: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.opensuse.org/thread/3DCTJYT3QZINPM7BPZJNC7A4HG2DGM6E/#LHPEQAVU2ZAP557SI7ZPIXYLXQFCP6PV
@Alexander_Naumov, @WernerFink, @ahodgkinson, @bitshuffler, @dbuss, @duwe, @gregfreemyer, @jjolly, @jsegitz, @lrupp, @mseben, @msmeissn, @psmt, @supergeeko, @varkoly, @vpereirabr: review reminder
Request History
ojkastl_buildservice created request
new package falcosidekick: simple daemon for connecting Falco to your ecosystem
msmeissn accepted request
ok
generally use Source URLs , and not services if you ship released tarballs.
Hi Marcus,
thanks for checking. If there are checksum files available for the tarball, then yes, using a released tarball is a good idea.
In many cases, like for falcosidekick, there is no checksum available. So I prefer to trust Git rather than some tarball uploaded to a GitHub release.
Kind Regards, Johannes
Marcus, can we revisit this SR now that we had the same discussion on the other SR last week? And git checkouts were acceptable?
@Alexander_Naumov, @WernerFink, @ahodgkinson, @bitshuffler, @dbuss, @duwe, @gregfreemyer, @jjolly, @jsegitz, @lrupp, @mseben, @msmeissn, @ojkastl_buildservice, @psmt, @varkoly, @vpereirabr: review reminder