Overview
Request 1188849 declined
- Created by msmeissn
- In state declined
-
Open review for
factory-staging
Request History
msmeissn created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
ok
staging-bot added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:66"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:66"
bigironman accepted review
Accepted review for by_group opensuse-review-team request 1188849 from user staging-bot
dimstar_suse declined request
[ 11s] tuned-ppd.noarch: E: dbus-file-unauthorized (Badness: 10000) /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/net.hadess.PowerProfiles.service (sha256 file digest default filter:a32051432a8c942cfab0593086989ef7579521f5a9e3374c4661c753167a5ba5 shell filter:a32051432a8c942cfab0593086989ef7579521f5a9e3374c4661c753167a5ba5 xml filter:)
[ 11s] tuned-ppd.noarch: E: dbus-file-unauthorized (Badness: 10000) /usr/share/dbus-1/system.d/net.hadess.PowerProfiles.conf (sha256 file digest default filter:2d74038e05aebe980ffab0ec73bc91057d0176f986301574ce4d3229e2b2ceb5 shell filter:ae0ec7ef77e5f522e50cc5a75c8881134c1d32286a04fbcd6b26a2697711c5a0 xml filter:3c9b773133201b3ecc7469dd9bc93253a992045e5cee5447def1d99f5b1e6ed5)
[ 11s] Packaging D-Bus services requires a review and whitelisting by the SUSE
[ 11s] security team. If the package is intended for inclusion in any SUSE product
[ 11s] please open a bug report to request review of the package by the security
[ 11s] team. Please refer to
[ 11s] https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Package_security_guidelines#audit_bugs for
[ 11s] more information.
dimstar_suse reopened request
Reopened via staging workflow.
dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer
Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:66"
dimstar_suse declined request
Declined via staging workflow.
Pardon me for interrupting - I was working on the ppd/tuned conflict, and stumbled across this request. Thanks for packaging this!
Might I suggest that the -ppd package
providespower-profiles-daemon? I guess that, since so many other packages (eg kde and gnome) depend upon power-profiles-daemon, this newprovideswould be needed to drop tuned-ppd in its place, especially with theconflictsadded.Otherwise, it could be good to leave out the
conflicts, so that both packages can be installed, but the user would need to mask power-profiles-daemon service... Or maybe you see some better solution? I will leave it in your capable hands and try tuned-ppd again soon. Thanks for your time.