Overview
Request 1191875 accepted
- Setup obsoletes/provides to cover the renaming of the library SONAME.
- update to first source tarball release v0.3.1. Drop git SCM service.
- change library package name from libcosmos-0_2_0 to libcosmos-0, because it
needs to follow the library's SONAME which is libcosmos.so.0.
- Update to version 0.2.1+gitcb2663e:
* buildsystem: fix bug in passing multiple parameters via CXXFLAGS & friends
* test/thread.cxx: fix potential race condition in isCallerThread()
* buildsystem: passthrough ASAN_OPTIONS
* tests: on unit test error cat logfile to stderr
* bump lib version which now contains memory mapping API
* github action: disable ODR iolation checks in unit tests in sanitizer build
* README.md: add info about recent developments
* check.py: support more fine tuning regarding which configs are built
* tests: mman: disable core dumping for expected SEGFAULT
* check.py: use dedicated buildroot that is cleaned before each config
* LinkLayerAddress: make some exotic protocols optional
* support older toolchains and non-x86 architectures better
* buildsystem.py: be prepared for TERM not existing
* buildsystem.py: satisfy flake8 "missing whitespace after comma"
* check.py: refer to current HEAD, not to master
* .github: add github action workflow file
* global: fix spelling errors in comments and documentation
* mman.hxx: fix doxygen list item indentation
* README: remove mention of memory mappings, which are available by now
* addrinfo test: switch UDP resolve from http to tftp
* feature: add support for memory mapping functionality
* FileBase: add runcate() member function
naming error, should be libcosmos0 not libcosmo-0. (bug in rpmlint, looking at it)
Where exactly are you seeing this naming error?
well, in the .spec obviously:
62-%files -n libcosmos-0_2_0
63+%files -n libcosmos-0
cf. libz1 (not libz-1), libzvbi0 (not libzvbi-0), etc. After all, the DT_SONAME is libcosmos.so.0 not libcosmos-0.so.
I see! You just mean the fact that rpmlint doesn't complain about the SONAME mismatch.
You had a typo there in your first comment so I thought there is some reference towards some libcosmo-0.
Request History
mgerstner created request
- Setup obsoletes/provides to cover the renaming of the library SONAME.
- update to first source tarball release v0.3.1. Drop git SCM service.
- change library package name from libcosmos-0_2_0 to libcosmos-0, because it
needs to follow the library's SONAME which is libcosmos.so.0.
- Update to version 0.2.1+gitcb2663e:
* buildsystem: fix bug in passing multiple parameters via CXXFLAGS & friends
* test/thread.cxx: fix potential race condition in isCallerThread()
* buildsystem: passthrough ASAN_OPTIONS
* tests: on unit test error cat logfile to stderr
* bump lib version which now contains memory mapping API
* github action: disable ODR iolation checks in unit tests in sanitizer build
* README.md: add info about recent developments
* check.py: support more fine tuning regarding which configs are built
* tests: mman: disable core dumping for expected SEGFAULT
* check.py: use dedicated buildroot that is cleaned before each config
* LinkLayerAddress: make some exotic protocols optional
* support older toolchains and non-x86 architectures better
* buildsystem.py: be prepared for TERM not existing
* buildsystem.py: satisfy flake8 "missing whitespace after comma"
* check.py: refer to current HEAD, not to master
* .github: add github action workflow file
* global: fix spelling errors in comments and documentation
* mman.hxx: fix doxygen list item indentation
* README: remove mention of memory mappings, which are available by now
* addrinfo test: switch UDP resolve from http to tftp
* feature: add support for memory mapping functionality
* FileBase: add runcate() member function
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
staging-bot added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:14 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:14"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:14"
licensedigger accepted review
ok
darix declined request
obsoleting shared libraries is not done at package level
dimstar_suse reopened request
Package rename is due to previously wrong name (same content), in this case the obsoletes tag is correct; we do not obsolete when the lib content changes (e.g parallel installable)
dimstar accepted review
dimstar_suse accepted review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:14 got accepted.
dimstar_suse approved review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:14 got accepted.
dimstar_suse accepted request
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:14 got accepted.
Can you please be a bit more specific what exactly is wrong?
shared libraries get removed at the distribution level via weak remover. you do not have to add provides/obsoletes for them.
The point here is that a library package rename happened. My previous sr#1189341 was declined, because I was not handling the package rename.
This package rename business is pretty confusing to me. What should it be now?