Overview

Request 1196262 revoked

No description set
Loading...

Christophe Marin's avatar

Huh? My SRs for guvcview and cutterff built fine with the ffmpeg 7, why do you want to use the old version exactly?


Dave Plater's avatar
author source maintainer

I received notification that it wasn't building for factory. You are welcome to fix it to build with ffmpeg-7, I'll even make you a maintainer so that you get the notification, this includes cutterff as well.


Marcus Rueckert's avatar

why do we downgrade to ffmpeg-6? we really want to move to 7 and get rid of older versions.


Dave Plater's avatar
author source maintainer

it's failed to build since August 13, 2024 12:03


Dave Plater's avatar
author source maintainer

Should I revoke this as well?


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar
 Dave Plater's avatar Dave Plater (plater) accepted request 1196261 from Dave Plater's avatar Dave Plater (plater) about 4 hours ago (revision 20)

- Force ffmpeg-6 library use in order to fix build

    Files Changed
    Browse Source

Takashi Iwai's avatar Takashi Iwai (tiwai) accepted request 1196234 from Christophe Marin's avatar Christophe Marin (krop) about 5 hours ago (revision 19)

- Update to 2.1.0
  * Fix audio channels deprecated warning for avcodec >= 58

The fix to build with ffmpeg7 was only a few hours older than the locking to ffmpeg 6... there were two ways to fix the build failure


Dave Plater's avatar
author source maintainer

So why wasn't it submitted, that's what superseded is for. Instead of all of these demeaning comments.


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

I'm on the receiving end of those requests - and do not control what happens in devel projects.

What I can see is that Christoph's SR, updating the version and fixing ffmpeg7 usage was accepted, and later you submitted a ffmpeg-6 lock to the devel prj and accepted it. At that time it presumably was already fixed in the devel prj but you did not notice it


Dave Plater's avatar
author source maintainer

Just my bad luck that somebody failed to forward the request to Factory, I would have seen it then, instead I was treated as if I was a naughty child. I'm 70 years old by the way.


Christophe Marin's avatar

They were. Your SRs caused automatic decline and @tiwai revoked the SRs afterwards.

See SR#1196251 and SR#1196252


Jan Engelhardt's avatar

Users owning a @​opensuse.org address have a Code of Conduct to follow and so do not give old age bonuses.

*cough* Moving on…! ;-)

Request History
Dave Plater's avatar

plater created request


Ana Guerrero's avatar

anag+factory added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:31 as a reviewer

Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:31"


Ana Guerrero's avatar

anag+factory accepted review

Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:31"


Factory Auto's avatar

factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer

Please review sources


Factory Auto's avatar

factory-auto accepted review

Check script succeeded


Saul Goodman's avatar

licensedigger accepted review

The legal review is accepted preliminary. The package may require actions later on.


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar declined review

The update alone should have fixed build already - the slightly more recent lock-down to ffmpeg6 should not be needed.


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar declined request

The update alone should have fixed build already - the slightly more recent lock-down to ffmpeg6 should not be needed.


Ana Guerrero's avatar

anag+factory reopened request

Reopened via staging workflow.


Ana Guerrero's avatar

anag+factory added factory-staging as a reviewer

Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"


Ana Guerrero's avatar

anag+factory accepted review

Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:31"


Ana Guerrero's avatar

anag+factory declined request

Declined via staging workflow.


Dave Plater's avatar

plater revoked request

openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by