Request 1204519 (declined)

This request supersedes: request 1204510 (Show diff)

Overview

Request 1204519 declined

- Update to 1.37.0
- remove unnecessary patch ash-fix-segfault-d417193cf.patch
- Update default config to match 1.37.0 expectations

Created by msmeissn about 2 months ago
In state declined
Supersedes 1204510

Submit busybox

Comments for request 1204519 7

Ana Guerrero (anag+factory) - about 2 months ago

reviewer

can't install busybox-adduser-1.36.1-33.47.noarch:
nothing provides busybox = 1.36.1 needed by busybox-adduser-1.36.1.noarch
  (we have busybox-1.37.0-1.1.x86_64)

can't install busybox-attr-1.36.1-33.47.noarch:
nothing provides busybox = 1.36.1 needed by busybox-attr-1.36.1.noarch
  (we have busybox-1.37.0-1.1.x86_64)

can't install busybox-bc-1.36.1-33.47.noarch:
nothing provides busybox = 1.36.1 needed by busybox-bc-1.36.1.noarch
  (we have busybox-1.37.0-1.1.x86_64)

can't install busybox-bind-utils-1.36.1-33.47.noarch:
nothing provides busybox = 1.36.1 needed by busybox-bind-utils-1.36.1.noarch
  (we have busybox-1.37.0-1.1.x86_64)

etc

Thorsten Kukuk (kukuk) - about 2 months ago

source maintainer

Something seems to be wrong with your testings and you are mixing new busybox with old busybox-links. busybox-links needs to be rebuild with the new busybox package.

Ana Guerrero (anag+factory) - about 2 months ago

reviewer

Hi Thorsten, busybox-links was rebuilt against the new busybox. See the comment of fabian about setting Release and re-submit

Thorsten Kukuk (kukuk) - about 2 months ago

source maintainer

I made neither the update nor did I submit it. And the release number statement doesn't really make sense to me since the version number is wrong. But since I'm still traveling this week I have neither time to debug nor to fix other people changes.

Thorsten Kukuk (kukuk) - about 1 month ago

source maintainer

@anag+factory The busybox-links was not rebuild against the new busybox, else the version numbers would be identical and busybox-links would not have the old version numbers. It's easy to prove: build both packages in the same project: [ 21s] build: extracting built packages... [ 21s] RPMS/noarch/busybox-misc-1.37.0-54.2.noarch.rpm [ 21s] RPMS/noarch/busybox-coreutils-1.37.0-54.2.noarch.rpm [ 21s] RPMS/noarch/busybox-gzip-1.37.0-54.2.noarch.rpm

Fabians comment about release numbers is not from relevance here. There is nothing I can fix, resubmitting the busybox will not fix the problem on OBS/whatever side which causes mixing up old and new RPMs.

Ana Guerrero (anag+factory) - about 1 month ago

reviewer

Hi thorsten, let's restage this again and see from there.