Overview
Request 1219525 accepted
- update to 0.28.0
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.28.0
- add back the service file for vendoring modules
- update to 0.27.5
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.5
- update to 0.27.4
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.4
- update to 0.27.2
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.2
- update to 0.27.1
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.1
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.0
- update to 0.26.2
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.26.2
- update to 0.26.1
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.26.1
- update to 0.26.0
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.26.0
- update to 0.25.2
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.25.2
- Created by darix
- In state accepted
- Package maintainers: darix and ojkastl_buildservice
- Supersedes 1218612
Request History
darix created request
- update to 0.28.0
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.28.0
- add back the service file for vendoring modules
- update to 0.27.5
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.5
- update to 0.27.4
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.4
- update to 0.27.2
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.2
- update to 0.27.1
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.1
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.0
- update to 0.26.2
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.26.2
- update to 0.26.1
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.26.1
- update to 0.26.0
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.26.0
- update to 0.25.2
https://github.com/smallstep/cli/releases/tag/v0.25.2
ojkastl_buildservice accepted request
changes file completely rewritten?
As darix's package is "older" than what is in security and Factory, we wanted to align the packages, so both of use can maintain them.
This is the third iteration of the SR, as the _service file was missing in one and we had some discussions.
Not sure, if we should combine darix' older changelog entries with the existing ones or if we completely go with darix' changelog. I personally do not mind, but I am not sure what Factory says about this?
Any objections, Marcus?
@ojkastl_buildservice: review reminder