Check script succeeded

Please review sources

Please review build success

Pick Staging Project

Builds for repo security:netfilter/openSUSE_Factory

{"delegate": "new package ldb.risk is None"}

{"delegate": "new package ldb.risk is None"}

No need for staging, not in tested ring projects.

Everything indicates that this package should actually be called nftables-plus instead of nftables:
- The upstream tarball is called like this.
- The actual binary rpm you create is called like this.

Following the approach of downstream package name follows upstream name: please rename the package accordingly.

It is unclear at this time where nftables is going. Should nftables-plus
merge back, I do not want to deal with BSpkg renames, because they are
a real hassle.

I therefore opted for a specfile layout similar to iptraf/iptraf-ng,
where the BSpkg name is set to the base name, and then playing with
RPM filenames inside .spec.

nftables is distributed under the terms of the GPL version 2. Note that
*only* version 2 of the GPL applies, not "any later version".
Patrick McHardy

nftables is distributed under the terms of the GPL version 2. Note that
*only* version 2 of the GPL applies, not "any later version".
Patrick McHardy

superseded by 244181