Overview
Request 264413 superseded
Needed for arm32 on aarch64, and preview of next
version 2.25.
- Created by matz2
- In state superseded
- Superseded by 264543
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A
Request History
matz2 created request
Needed for arm32 on aarch64, and preview of next
version 2.25.
licensedigger accepted review
{"approve": "preliminary, version number changed"}
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
Output of check script (non-fatal):
No such file or directory: _old/cross-epiphany-binutils.changes at /home/factoryauto/osc-plugin-factory.aplanas/source-checker.pl line 200.
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo devel:gcc/openSUSE_Factory
mlin7442 set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A"
mlin7442 accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A
dimstar declined review
But I decline it anyway - you delete a bunch of patches which are NOT mentioned in the .changes; factory-auto simply was fooled by a full copy of a .changes file which added those patches - but I'm not that easily fooled :)
So, in line of the packaging guidelines:
Please see
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Patches_guidelines#Patch_live_cycle
=> Added / removed patches need to be mentioned by name in .changes, in
order to get a full trail of life cycles.
dimstar declined request
But I decline it anyway - you delete a bunch of patches which are NOT mentioned in the .changes; factory-auto simply was fooled by a full copy of a .changes file which added those patches - but I'm not that easily fooled :)
So, in line of the packaging guidelines:
Please see
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Patches_guidelines#Patch_live_cycle
=> Added / removed patches need to be mentioned by name in .changes, in
order to get a full trail of life cycles.
