Overview
Request 452312 superseded
Update to version 1.0.0 with spec file and changelog cleanups
- Created by charlesa
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 452308
- Superseded by 455147
- Open review for factory-repo-checker
- Open review for factory-staging
Request History
charlesa created request
Update to version 1.0.0 with spec file and changelog cleanups
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
jengelh accepted review
factory-repo-checker reopened review
Execution plan: hardware/openSUSE_Tumbleweed
can't install libosinfo-1.0.0-62.1.x86_64:
nothing provides osinfo-db needed by libosinfo-1.0.0-62.1.x86_64
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C
factory-repo-checker reopened review
can't install libosinfo-1.0.0-63.1.x86_64:
nothing provides osinfo-db needed by libosinfo-1.0.0-63.1.x86_64
factory-repo-checker reopened review
can't install php5-pgsql-5.6.30-361.1.x86_64:
nothing provides libpq.so.5()(64bit) needed by php5-pgsql-5.6.30-361.1.x86_64
factory-repo-checker reopened review
can't install postgresql95-devel-9.5.5-7.1.x86_64:
nothing provides libecpg6 >= 9.5 needed by postgresql95-devel-9.5.5-7.1.x86_64
nothing provides libpq5 >= 9.5 needed by postgresql95-devel-9.5.5-7.1.x86_64
dimstar_suse accepted review
Removing from openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C, re-evaluation needed
dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer
Requesting new staging review
factory-repo-checker reopened review
Execution plan: hardware/openSUSE_Tumbleweed
can't install libosinfo-1.0.0-62.1.x86_64:
nothing provides osinfo-db needed by libosinfo-1.0.0-62.1.x86_64
factory-repo-checker superseded request
superseded by 455147
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C:DVD/gnome-boxes/standard/x86_64
I don't mind the split out of the vala packages (Even though it probably does not make much sense, vala is just a different language and so far we never split devel per languages; vala is not like python where the stuff is used at runtime).
I'd suggest to either:
Just as a small sample set to support above statement:
That's all inside -devel packages
I will update the spec file and merge in the vala stuff into the devel package.