Request 577248 (superseded)

This request is superseded by request 578327 (Show diff)

Overview

Request 577248 superseded

This is a package rename openssl-1_1_0 -> openssl-1_1.
See bsc#1081335

Created by vitezslav_cizek over 6 years ago
In state superseded
Supersedes 577245
Superseded by 578327
Open review for repo-checker
Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:K

Submit openssl-1_1

Comments for request 577248 5
Comments for request 577245 1

Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar) - over 6 years ago

reviewer

nothing provides libopenssl-1_1_0-devel needed by libqt4-devel

Possibly others; the old name should really be provided/obsoleted by the renamed package

Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar) - over 6 years ago

reviewer

+# Needed for clean upgrade from former openssl-1_1_0, [boo#1081335](https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1081335)
+Obsoletes:      libopenssl-1_1_0-devel

Was my latest statement about PROVIDE/obsolete intentionally only half-implemented?

At least those two packages I found that will need extra love:

$ zypper se -t srcpackage --requires libopenssl-1_1_0
S | Name   | Summary                                | Type      
--+--------+----------------------------------------+-----------
  | libqt4 | C++ Program Library, Core Components   | srcpackage
  | odp    | OpenDataPlane Reference implementation | srcpackage

Vítězslav Čížek (vitezslav_cizek) - over 6 years ago

author

I'll fix the packages. There's no reason to explicitly require libopenssl-1_1_0, as it's the default now. And providing libopenssl-1_1_0 feels wrong, when we'll have 1.1.1 in 3 months.

Vítězslav Čížek (vitezslav_cizek) - over 6 years ago

author

https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/578636 https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/578638

Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar) - over 6 years ago

reviewer

Preferably we'd stick to pkgconfig(openssl) in this case, as it makes many things easier (incl. conflict resolution)