This request is superseded by
request 717661
(Show diff)
Overview
Request 716132 superseded
No description set
- Created by sbrabec
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 716130
- Superseded by 717661
- Open review for opensuse-review-team
- Open review for factory-staging
Loading...
Request History
sbrabec created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
ok
staging-bot set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B
dimstar_suse accepted review
Removing from openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B, re-evaluation needed
dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer
Requesting new staging review
dimstar_suse superseded request
Replaced with SR#717661
Is that a good idea? Adjusting the users pam stack in /etc is imho a really bad idea - we have no idea what the users did to their stack. They could have added gnome-keyring (as the pam-gnome-keyring package adds to the config), the could have enabled google auth. Resetting their config over and over will cause a ton of complaints
e.g on my machine, I have:
Except the comments, there is no real change I'd want util-linux to replace my files - as this would break my gnome keyring integration.
@kukuk can you please, with your pam background knowledge, have a look at this request?
for me, this sounds like a rabbit hole where we can never find out again.
Waiting for more feedback