Overview
Request 732635 accepted
- Created by RBrownSUSE
- In state accepted
Request History
RBrownSUSE created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
ok
mlschroe declined request
I need to talk with Fabian about that subpackage split.
mlschroe reopened request
ok
staging-bot set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B
dimstar_suse accepted review
Removing from openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B, re-evaluation needed
dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer
Requesting new staging review
dimstar accepted review
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A
dimstar_suse accepted review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
You had well over a month to have that conversation..infact, IIRC this topic had been open for a month before the last submission already..
You're missing the point. The subpackage split was already in factory some weeks ago but had to be reverted. So this needs to be discussed.
And you're missing the point of this submission - which is intended to fix the reasons for the revert. If you'd talked to him in the preceding 28 days you'd realise that already?..
No no, I know what this submission does. It's a band aid for that "Move more into rpm-build subpackage" commit that you accepted while I was on vacation. That's the thing I question and maybe want to revert.
Need to find a way to handle the library split in OBS