Overview
Request 82200 accepted
Reject of SR#82088 seemed not right. Answers to reject reasons:
1. license header is usually added when checkin is made to factory
(autobuild script?)
2. the spec is clean
3. depending on -%release is prudent. the distro-level maintainer may
decide to change something that makes %name-%version-1.1 incompatible
with %name-%version-2.1.
Request History
jengelh created request
Reject of SR#82088 seemed not right. Answers to reject reasons:
1. license header is usually added when checkin is made to factory
(autobuild script?)
2. the spec is clean
3. depending on -%release is prudent. the distro-level maintainer may
decide to change something that makes %name-%version-1.1 incompatible
with %name-%version-2.1.
licensedigger added a reviewer
{"delegate": "new package r>3"}
coolo added a reviewer
Please review sources
saschpe approved review
Sigh.
lrupp accepted request
Accepted submit request 82200 from user saschpe
licensedigger accepted review
{"delegate": "new package r>3"}
coolo accepted review
Builds for repo openSUSE_Factory
Output of check script (non-fatal):
- package has baselibs.conf: (new or modified)
--------------------------------------------------------------
libnl3-200
libnl3-devel
requires -libnl3-
requires "libnl3-200- = "
--------------------------------------------------------------
###ASK libnl3/baselibs.conf
babelworx accepted review
reviewed, okay
LGPL-2.1 and GPL-2.0 ok
saschpe accepted review
Sigh.
