One comment on the change to structured Github URL for Source: It seems from looking at your branch that the filename on disk remains a readable golang-github-jstemmer-junit-report-0.9.1.tar.gz . This is OK, would be less good if the filename on disk ended up as e.g. v0.9.1.tar.gz as we see happen in some packages.
I haven't used direct URLs in Source:, does this package need to configure any source services in _service to get any automation benefit? i.e. of updating via SR, what do I need to run with osc to pull that URL file down before committing to my branch?
Note the #/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz in the github URL. This gives the readable filename. You can put anything after #/ to get filename of your choice.
To download a new tarball after version change you can use
spectool -g *.spec
You have to remove the old tarball by hand and tell OBS to update the filelist but that's the same as when local service is used.
Download using spectool is much simpler and does not depend on OBS.
One comment on the change to structured Github URL for Source: It seems from looking at your branch that the filename on disk remains a readable golang-github-jstemmer-junit-report-0.9.1.tar.gz . This is OK, would be less good if the filename on disk ended up as e.g. v0.9.1.tar.gz as we see happen in some packages.
I haven't used direct URLs in Source:, does this package need to configure any source services in _service to get any automation benefit? i.e. of updating via SR, what do I need to run with osc to pull that URL file down before committing to my branch?
Note the #/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz in the github URL. This gives the readable filename. You can put anything after #/ to get filename of your choice.
To download a new tarball after version change you can use
spectool -g *.spec
You have to remove the old tarball by hand and tell OBS to update the filelist but that's the same as when local service is used.
Download using spectool is much simpler and does not depend on OBS.
@michals, since you are maintainer as well as the submitter, I've gone ahead and accepted rather than leave it in accepted review state.