Overview
Request History
mcepl created request
DO NOT SWITCH ON BUILDING OF PYTHON310-* PACKAGES YET!
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
dimstar_suse added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:15 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:15"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:15"
licensedigger accepted review
The legal review is accepted preliminary. The package may require actions later on.
simotek accepted review
I'm going to agree with mcepl's logic here, I don't think this is the time and place to change all of pythons naming, that would be better on the python mailing list.
RBrownSUSE accepted review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:15 got accepted.
RBrownSUSE approved review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:15 got accepted.
RBrownSUSE accepted request
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:15 got accepted.
A package name like python-3_10 would be way more appropriate. gcc went through the same, it just was not viable to keep "gcc33" because that 3.3 would collide with the real v33 someday.
You have a point, but
for both reasons I would like to have the symbol as short as possible.
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=python3.10
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10
I guess python3.10 is more elegant