Overview
Request History
mcepl created request
Required for new builds of Python.
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
dimstar_suse added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:52 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:52"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:52"
licensedigger accepted review
The legal review is accepted preliminary. The package may require actions later on.
dimstar accepted review
dimstar_suse accepted review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:52 got accepted.
dimstar_suse approved review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:52 got accepted.
dimstar_suse accepted request
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:52 got accepted.
That sounds wrong - since version is something 2.x.x, this can't be correct
OK, I agree, it is hard to believe, but:
As Jan Engelhardt has pointed out in the meantime, mpdecimal just does the same as the pari package here.
To my understanding (but I can be wrong of course) the library real name has no effect if the soname is set explicitly during linking.
That said, this issue has also led to raised eyebrows at Debian, so perhaps I'll do something about it in the next mpdecimal release.
We could of course rename libmpdec.so.2.5.1 to libmpdec-2.5.1.so for openSUSE, if you prefer that.
No, I think we can keep it as it is. Somebody pointed to great precedent: