Overview
Request 947370 accepted
- add python-rpm-macros (bsc#1194748)
- spec: also provide btrfs-progs as it's common package name in other distros
- spec: clean up conditionals for < 12 versions
- spec: let SLE12 build again (conditional dependency of libreiserfscore)
- Removed patches: sles11-defaults.h (no SLE11 compatibility anymore)
- Added patches: btrfs-progs-kerncompat-add-local-definition-for-alig.patch
(fix build on SLE12/SLE15)
- Created by dirkmueller
- In state accepted
- Supersedes 947284
@dsterba btrfs-progs(%_arch) should be btrfs-progs%{?_isa} instead.
Is it a standard macro? I can't find any docs how it's supposed to be used, only the definition in rpm macros (/usr/lib/rpm/macros) and a cromment I'm not how to relate to _arch "ISA dependency marker, none for noarch and name-bitness for others"
Request History
dirkmueller created request
- add python-rpm-macros (bsc#1194748)
- spec: also provide btrfs-progs as it's common package name in other distros
- spec: clean up conditionals for < 12 versions
- spec: let SLE12 build again (conditional dependency of libreiserfscore)
- Removed patches: sles11-defaults.h (no SLE11 compatibility anymore)
- Added patches: btrfs-progs-kerncompat-add-local-definition-for-alig.patch
(fix build on SLE12/SLE15)
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
ok
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F"
dimstar accepted review
dimstar_suse accepted review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F got accepted.
dimstar_suse approved review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F got accepted.
dimstar_suse accepted request
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F got accepted.
