Overview
Request 949602 superseded
next gen of fcitx
- Created by MargueriteSu
- In state superseded
- Superseded by 952702
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:11
Request History
MargueriteSu created request
next gen of fcitx
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
dimstar_suse added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:11"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:11"
licensedigger accepted review
ok
dimstar declined review
can't install libFcitx5Qt5DBusAddons1-32bit-5.0.9-1.1.x86_64:
nothing provides liibstdc++6-32bit needed by libFcitx5Qt5DBusAddons1-32bit-5.0.9.x86_64
can't install fcitx5-gtk4-32bit-5.0.11-1.1.x86_64:
nothing provides libgtk-4.so.1 needed by fcitx5-gtk4-32bit-5.0.11.x86_64
Neither Qt6 nor GTK4 provide 32bit compact libs; so far there seems no consumer of those and I wonder if fcitx gains benefit fromproviding the -32bit packages
dimstar declined request
can't install libFcitx5Qt5DBusAddons1-32bit-5.0.9-1.1.x86_64:
nothing provides liibstdc++6-32bit needed by libFcitx5Qt5DBusAddons1-32bit-5.0.9.x86_64
can't install fcitx5-gtk4-32bit-5.0.11-1.1.x86_64:
nothing provides libgtk-4.so.1 needed by fcitx5-gtk4-32bit-5.0.11.x86_64
Neither Qt6 nor GTK4 provide 32bit compact libs; so far there seems no consumer of those and I wonder if fcitx gains benefit fromproviding the -32bit packages
30+Summary: Next generation of fcitx
Isn't this rather the current generation? 'time based' wording in summaries and descriptions are outdated faster than the packages can possibly build
Qt6 does not build -32bit packages. Do we really need them for fcitx?
also: