Request 992167 (accepted)

Overview

Request 992167 accepted

No description set

Created by dirkmueller almost 2 years ago
In state accepted

Submit docker-compose

Comments for request 992167 7

Johannes Kastl (ojkastl_buildservice) - almost 2 years ago

source maintainer

This needs SR#987335 to not break things, please wait for this to be accepted and submitted to Factory

(docker-compose 2.x does no longer provide a docker-compose binary, which is provided by the docker-compose-switch package submitted in that SR)

Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar) - almost 2 years ago

reviewer

That SR was so far only submitted (and accepted) to the devel project, but not to Factory.

Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar) - almost 2 years ago

reviewer

That's actually slighly 'confusing' for the users IMHO.

so far, one could do 'zypper in docker-compose' (which was provided by python310-docker-compose) and then run it.

Now, zypper in docker-compose gives this new package, which does not have the binary - and one will have to KNOW to install docker-compose-switch to get going.

That's quite a confusing UI (and trips over openQA - rather easy fixable) https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2496472#step/docker_compose/76)

Johannes Kastl (ojkastl_buildservice) - almost 2 years ago

source maintainer

Hmmm, in my testing before creating the SRs this worked and both docker-compose and docker-compose-switch were being installed.

I can submit a SR where docker-compose has a hard requirement on docker-compose-switch, as this should not harm people that would only want docker-compose without the compatibility package.

Johannes Kastl (ojkastl_buildservice) - almost 2 years ago

source maintainer

SR#993285

Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar) - almost 2 years ago

reviewer

you were probably upgrading, which helped as docker-compose-switch obsoleted the previous python3x-docker-compose packages - resulting in them being swapped.

On clean installs, this was missing. The requires seems like a possible workaround

Johannes Kastl (ojkastl_buildservice) - almost 2 years ago

source maintainer

You are right, I misread.

SR#/993840 is on its way to Factory.