Overview
Request 1092549 superseded
- Reintroduce removing /usr/bin/env from shebang lines as well as
duplicate files them selfs
- Do not package this as multi-python flavors: urlscan is a simple
leaf application written in python. Its python code is not
consumed by others.
- Update to urlscan 1.0.0
* Fix search with -c flag. Fixes #131.
* Add support for IPv6 URLs. Closes #127
* Mark items in url queue with a *
* Add version flag
* Update to pyproject.toml/hatch for builds
- Switch over to flavoured build
* Is there any way to have one major package e.g. for repeating
docs for the various flavoured sub packages?
- Created by WernerFink
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 1090516
- Superseded by 1092570
-
Open review for
factory-staging
-
Open review for
opensuse-review-team
found conflict of python310-urlscan-1.0.0-1.1.noarch with urlscan-0.9.10-1.2.noarch /usr/share/man/man1/urlscan.1.gz /usr/bin/urlscan found conflict of python311-urlscan-1.0.0-1.1.noarch with urlscan-0.9.10-1.2.noarch /usr/share/man/man1/urlscan.1.gz /usr/bin/urlscan found conflict of python39-urlscan-1.0.0-1.1.noarch with urlscan-0.9.10-1.2.noarch /usr/share/man/man1/urlscan.1.gz /usr/bin/urlscan found conflict of python310-urlscan-1.0.0-1.1.noarch with urlscan-0.9.10-1.2.noarch /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/__init__.py /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/__main__.py /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/urlchoose.py /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/urlscan.py /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-310.opt-1.pyc /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-310.pyc /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/__pycache__/__main__.cpython-310.opt-1.pyc /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/__pycache__/__main__.cpython-310.pyc /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/__pycache__/urlchoose.cpython-310.opt-1.pyc /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/__pycache__/urlchoose.cpython-310.pyc /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/__pycache__/urlscan.cpython-310.opt-1.pyc /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/__pycache__/urlscan.cpython-310.pyc /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/urlscan/assets/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt
The upgrade path is not properly defined apparently
Does this mean that the build scheme of the python now creates a package split ... how I can avoid this?
you changed the package to be split per python version...
+%python_subpackages
-%files
-%license COPYING
-%{_bindir}/%{name}
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}
-%{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py*.egg-info
-%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1%{?ext_man}
-%dir %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/
-%doc %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/muttrc
-%doc %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/README.md
+%post
+%python_install_alternative %{myname}
+
+%postun
+%python_uninstall_alternative %{myname}
+
+%files %{python_files}
+%python_alternative %{_bindir}/%{myname}
+%python_alternative %{_mandir}/man1/%{myname}.1%{?ext_man}
+%{python_sitelib}/%{myname}
+%{python_sitelib}/%{myname}-%{version}*-info
+%license LICENSE
+%doc README.md muttrc
I don't see much reason to do so unless urlscan's python code is consumed by anything else than urlscan. Otherwise this is just to be considered internal to urlscan and does not justify it being shipped multiple times
The old macros do not work anymore ... and the new seems to be for python only packages ...
[ 5s] error: Package with "python-" prefix must not contain unmarked "%files" sections.
[ 5s] error: Use "%files %python_files" or "%files %{python_files foo} instead.
[ 5s]
What do you think about
Request History
WernerFink created request
- Reintroduce removing /usr/bin/env from shebang lines as well as
duplicate files them selfs
- Do not package this as multi-python flavors: urlscan is a simple
leaf application written in python. Its python code is not
consumed by others.
- Update to urlscan 1.0.0
* Fix search with -c flag. Fixes #131.
* Add support for IPv6 URLs. Closes #127
* Mark items in url queue with a *
* Add version flag
* Update to pyproject.toml/hatch for builds
- Switch over to flavoured build
* Is there any way to have one major package e.g. for repeating
docs for the various flavoured sub packages?
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
ok
superseded by 1092570
